A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare postoperative pain levels between two filling techniques used in non-surgical root canal treatment for irreversible pulpitis.
  • Both techniques were executed under a standardized protocol, with pain assessments conducted through surveys at 4, 24, and 48 hours post-treatment.
  • Results indicated no significant difference in pain levels between the two techniques, suggesting that the choice of filling method does not affect postoperative pain intensity.

Article Abstract

Objective: This prospective clinical study compares postoperative pain after single-visit, non-surgical root canal treatment of teeth with irreversible pulpitis using two different root canal filling techniques.

Material And Methods: All cases were treated by endodontic residents with a standardized protocol (minimum apical size 35) and filled with one of the two techniques: warm vertical compaction technique (WVT) with gutta percha and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer, Dentsply Maillefer, York, PA, USA) or sealer-based filling technique (SBT) with single cone gutta percha and calcium silicate-based sealer (EndoSequence BC Sealer, Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA). Surveys were given to participating patients to record pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at 4, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 level.

Results: One hundred ninety-four surveys were distributed over eighteen months. Ninety-two patients returned the survey (41 WVT and 51 SBT), of which 38% were asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis cases. The NRS values reduced over time for both techniques. No statistical difference was found between the two groups at the three time points assessed (p > 0.05). Postoperative pain was related to age, gender, presence of preoperative pain, and sealer extrusion (p < 0.05), however not related to preoperative periapical symptoms (percussion/palpation), dental arch, root type, and experience of the provider (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The intensity of postoperative pain for the two obturation techniques was equivalent at evaluated time points.

Clinical Relevance: The obturation technique does not influence postoperative pain. After endodontic treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis teeth, the pain subsides in 48 h regardless of the technique.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04462731.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03814-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative pain
20
root canal
16
irreversible pulpitis
12
pain
8
canal filling
8
warm vertical
8
resin-based sealer
8
calcium silicate-based
8
silicate-based sealer
8
prospective clinical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!