A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of hydroxyapatite and silica nanoparticles on erosive lesions remineralization. | LitMetric

Aim: The aim is to assess and compare the mineral gain and penetration depth of hydroxyapatite and silica nanoparticle infiltrates into artificially created erosive lesions of enamel and dentin.

Materials And Methods: Sixty extracted human molars were sectioned to obtain enamel and dentin samples ( = 60 each). They were demineralized using citric and formic acid, respectively, to create erosive lesions on enamel and dentin surfaces. Samples were assigned into nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) or nanosilica groups ( = 30 each) according to the infiltrant used. Half of the enamel and dentin samples in each group ( = 15) were analyzed after erosive attack for mineral loss, after infiltrant application for mineral gain, using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. In another half of the enamel and dentin samples ( = 15), the penetration depth of the nanoinfiltrants was analyzed using confocal microscopy.

Statistical Analysis: To compare the overall mineral gain between groups, a dependent -test was applied. The intergroup comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for pairwise comparisons for both penetration depth and mineral gain. The significance level was set to P ≤ 0.05.

Results: The mineral gain in enamel was not statistically different between nHA and nanosilica infiltrants ( = 0.9950). nHA infiltrated dentin showed significantly more mineral gain ( = 0.0001) than nanosilica infiltrant. The depth of penetration of the nHA in enamel was statistically greater than that of nanosilica, but in dentin, the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: nHA infiltrant performed better in mineral gain, and penetrated deeper into the demineralized erosive lesions, compared to nanosilica infiltrant in both enamel and dentin. The highest mineral precipitation and deeper penetration into both demineralized enamel and dentin was observed with nHA infiltrant compared to (as against) nanosilica infiltrant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861069PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_182_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mineral gain
28
enamel dentin
24
erosive lesions
16
penetration depth
12
dentin samples
12
nanosilica infiltrant
12
mineral
9
enamel
9
hydroxyapatite silica
8
compare mineral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!