A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. | LitMetric

Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved.

J Conserv Dent

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Published: December 2020

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the thickness of oxygen inhibition layer (OIL), produced on various composite materials, and to compare their interlayer shear bond strength (SBS), by treating the OIL with various agents.

Materials And Methods: The thickness of OIL of three different composite materials (120 specimens divided into three groups) Group 1 - Ivoclar Tetric N-Ceram (nanohybrid composite), Group 2 - Ivoclar Te Econom Plus (microhybrid composite), and Group 3 - GC EverX Posterior (a short glass fiber-reinforced composite) was evaluated. Each group was divided into four subgroups (A, B, C, and D) depending on the surface treatment given - no surface treatment (control group), ethanol, water spray, and grinding with SiC paper. This was followed by interlayer SBS testing.

Statistical Analysis: The data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA at a significance level of < 0.05. Tukey's analysis was performed following ANOVA to determine differences among the groups.

Results: The control group showed higher SBS irrespective of the type of composite material. The group treated with SiC paper resulted in the lowest interlayer SBS among all groups. Glass fiber composite showed higher interlayer SBS compared to both nanohybrid and microhybrid composites, irrespective of the surface treatment given.

Conclusion: The OIL, which acts as an intermediate layer, is retained on the surface of the composite even after treatment with ethanol and water spray. The presence of an OIL improved the interlayer SBS of two adjacent composite layers and led to more durable adhesion. Rather, the absence of an OIL adversely affected the bond strength and led to adhesive interfacial failures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7861070PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_325_19DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interlayer sbs
16
surface treatment
12
composite
9
oxygen inhibition
8
inhibition layer
8
composite materials
8
bond strength
8
group ivoclar
8
composite group
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!