AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various genetic testing methods (QF-PCR, CMA, and ES) in diagnosing congenital heart disease (CHD) in fetuses and their association with extra-cardiac anomalies (ECAs).
  • Conducted across 12 UK foetal medicine centers, the research assessed 147 cases, revealing a genetic diagnosis in 34.7% of instances, with distinct diagnostic yields from each technology.
  • Findings indicated that QF-PCR was most effective for septal defects, CMA for conotruncal anomalies, and that complex CHD had a higher diagnostic yield, highlighting the continued importance of traditional testing methods alongside advanced exome sequencing.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The objective was to evaluate: (i) the proportion of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) associated with an abnormal quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR), chromosome microarray (CMA), and exome sequencing (ES) result; and (ii) the diagnostic yield of these technologies based on CHD category and presence of extra-cardiac anomalies (ECAs).

Methods: This prospective cohort study was set across 12 UK foetal medicine centres. All cases underwent QF-PCR, CMA, and ES, and the diagnostic yield in n = 147 cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD was assessed.

Results: In 34.7% (n = 51/147), a genetic diagnosis was obtained. Using a stepwise testing strategy, the diagnostic yield for QF-PCR, CMA, and ES was 15.6% (n = 23/147), 13.7% (n = 17/124), and 10.2% (n = 11/107), respectively. Abnormal QF-PCR/shunt (septal) defects 31.4% (n = 11/35), p = 0.046, and abnormal CMA/conotruncal anomalies 22.7% (n = 10/44), p = 0.04, had significant associations. Monogenic variants were commonest in complex CHD 36.4% (n = 4/11). Multisystem CHD had a greater diagnostic yield overall compared to isolated OR 2.41 (95% CI, 1.1-5.1), particularly in association with brain and gastrointestinal tract anomalies. The proportion of variants of uncertain significance was 4.7% (n = 5/107) with ES, with none in the CMA group.

Conclusion: In the era of prenatal ES, there remains an important role for QF-PCR and CMA. Identification of monogenic pathologic variants further allows delineation of prognosis in CHD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000512488DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic yield
20
qf-pcr cma
12
congenital heart
8
heart disease
8
prospective cohort
8
cohort study
8
prenatally diagnosed
8
chd
6
diagnostic
5
cma
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!