A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 211

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3330
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 38
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 211

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3102
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 211

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3138
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3138
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction. | LitMetric

Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction.

Clin Oral Investig

Department of Stomatology, Public Oral Health and Forensic Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Do Café, s/n, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil.

Published: August 2021

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) tube current (mA) on the magnitude of artefacts at different distances from titanium or zirconia implants, with and without activation of a proprietary metal artefact reduction (MAR).

Material And Methods: Human mandibles were scanned on an OP300 Maxio CBCT unit (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) before and after the installation of dental implants, with four different tube currents (4 mA, 6.3 mA, 8 mA and 10 mA), with and without activation of proprietary MAR. The effect of mA on the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were assessed in regions of interest located 1.5 cm, 2.5 cm, and 3.5 cm from implants.

Results: In the presence of titanium implants, a significant decrease in SD was found by increasing tube current from 4 mA to 6.3 mA or 8 mA. For zirconia implants, 8 mA yielded better results for all distances. MAR improved CNR in the presence of zirconia implants at all distances, whereas no differences were observed with the use of MAR for titanium implants.

Conclusion: Increased tube current can improve overall image quality in the presence of implants, at all the distances tested. When a zirconia implant is present, such increase in mA should be higher in comparison to that for examinations with titanium implants. Activation of OP300 Maxio proprietary MAR improved image quality only among examinations with zirconia implants.

Clinical Relevance: Artefact-generating implants are common in the field of view of CBCT examinations. Optimal exposure parameters, such as tube current, ensure high image quality with lowest possible radiation exposure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03821-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tube current
20
zirconia implants
16
image quality
12
implants
9
artefacts distances
8
distances titanium
8
titanium zirconia
8
cone-beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
metal artefact
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!