Severity: 8192
Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 211
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3330
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 38
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 211
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3102
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 211
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 211
Function: sleep
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3138
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 144
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 998
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3138
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) tube current (mA) on the magnitude of artefacts at different distances from titanium or zirconia implants, with and without activation of a proprietary metal artefact reduction (MAR).
Material And Methods: Human mandibles were scanned on an OP300 Maxio CBCT unit (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) before and after the installation of dental implants, with four different tube currents (4 mA, 6.3 mA, 8 mA and 10 mA), with and without activation of proprietary MAR. The effect of mA on the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were assessed in regions of interest located 1.5 cm, 2.5 cm, and 3.5 cm from implants.
Results: In the presence of titanium implants, a significant decrease in SD was found by increasing tube current from 4 mA to 6.3 mA or 8 mA. For zirconia implants, 8 mA yielded better results for all distances. MAR improved CNR in the presence of zirconia implants at all distances, whereas no differences were observed with the use of MAR for titanium implants.
Conclusion: Increased tube current can improve overall image quality in the presence of implants, at all the distances tested. When a zirconia implant is present, such increase in mA should be higher in comparison to that for examinations with titanium implants. Activation of OP300 Maxio proprietary MAR improved image quality only among examinations with zirconia implants.
Clinical Relevance: Artefact-generating implants are common in the field of view of CBCT examinations. Optimal exposure parameters, such as tube current, ensure high image quality with lowest possible radiation exposure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03821-y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!