Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices.

Sci Eng Ethics

Consumption Research Norway (SIFO), OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Stensberggata 26, N-0130, Oslo, Norway.

Published: February 2021

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is described as a new way of doing science that brings science closer to society. Based on a qualitatively oriented case study, this article supports previous research indicating that researchers face a variety of ethical problems and dilemmas when implementing RRI for the first time. These include difficulties with anticipating and controlling future impacts, an asymmetry of power between project partners and an elusive understanding of the RRI concept. The researchers’ challenges were rooted in conventional research ethics and could be boiled down to one core dilemma: If RRI had been applied from the very beginning of the project period, the chance of realising proof of concept within the scheduled time may decrease. The researchers’ solution to this dilemma was to prioritize proof of concept and postpone RRI activities to later stages of the project. If RRI is expected to live up to its ambition of representing a new way of doing science, more effort is needed at the political level to facilitate change.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854441PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00288-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proof concept
12
rri
7
concept trump
4
trump all?
4
all? rri
4
rri dilemmas
4
dilemmas practices
4
practices responsible
4
responsible innovation
4
innovation rri
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!