AI Article Synopsis

  • A study followed up on patients who had distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions, focusing on body weight, nutritional status, complications, and quality of life five years post-surgery.
  • Results showed no significant difference in body weight loss or nutritional status between the two methods, but the Billroth I group experienced more reflux esophagitis (19% vs 4.9% for Roux-en-Y) and had worse outcomes on the diarrhea quality of life scale.
  • Overall, while both reconstruction methods were similar in many respects, Roux-en-Y had advantages in preventing complications related to reflux and diarrhea.

Article Abstract

Aim: We previously reported in a randomized controlled trial that Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions were generally equivalent regarding body weight change and nutritional status 1 year after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. We describe the long-term follow-up data 5 years after distal gastrectomy.

Methods: We analyzed consecutive gastric cancer patients who were randomly assigned to undergo Billroth I or Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy. We evaluated body weight change, nutritional status, late complications, quality of life (QOL) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core QOL Questionnaire, and dysfunction using the Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer, 5 years after surgery.

Results: A total of 228 patients (Billroth I = 105; Roux-en-Y = 123) were eligible for efficacy analyses in this study. Body weight loss 5 years after surgery did not differ significantly between the Billroth I and Roux-en-Y groups (10.0% ± 7.9% and 9.6% ± 8.4%, respectively;  = .70). There were no significant differences in other aspects of nutritional status between the two groups. Reflux esophagitis occurred in 19.0% of the patients in the Billroth I group vs 4.9% in the Roux-en-Y group ( = .002). Regarding QOL, Billroth I was significantly inferior to Roux-en-Y on the diarrhea scale (Billroth I: 28.6, Roux-en-Y: 16.0;  = .047). Regarding dysfunction, no score differed significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions: Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions were generally equivalent regarding body weight change, nutritional status, and QOL 5 years after distal gastrectomy, although Roux-en-Y more effectively prevented reflux esophagitis and diarrhea.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832962PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12400DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

billroth roux-en-y
20
distal gastrectomy
16
body weight
16
nutritional status
16
gastric cancer
12
weight change
12
change nutritional
12
billroth
9
roux-en-y
9
roux-en-y reconstruction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!