AI Article Synopsis

  • Sunitinib is a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but the standard 4/2 dosing schedule can lead to severe adverse events (AEs); this study aimed to identify a better schedule with fewer side effects.
  • Seventy patients were divided into two groups: one followed the standard 4/2 schedule and the other a less intense 2/1 schedule, both receiving 50 mg/day of sunitinib.
  • Results showed that the 2/1 schedule had significantly lower adverse events and higher progression-free survival rates compared to the 4/2 schedule, making it a more effective and safer option for patients with metastatic RCC.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Sunitinib is a standard of care first line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib standard dose is 50 mg once daily for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks' off (4/2 schedule). Long-term and high exposure to this medication lead to severe adverse events (AEs); therefore, this trial was done to find the best schedule which gives the best outcome with minimal toxicity.

Materials And Methods: Seventy patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups, then received 50 mg/day of sunitinib. Group 1 (40 patients) received sunitinib for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule) while 30 patients were admitted to group 2 with 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1 schedule).

Results: All patients (100%) had significantly higher AEs on schedule 4/2 vs. 73.3% on schedule 2/1 ( = 0.001). Furthermore, the grade 3 AEs on schedule 2/1 were significantly lower than those on schedule 4/2 (26.7% vs. 82.5%) respectively ( = 0.001), such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, hand foot syndrome (HFS) and mucositis. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate was significantly higher in 2/1 schedule (60.9% vs. 38.6%) than in 4/2 schedule ( < 0.008). Multivariate analysis suggested that: age > 60 years, poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, tumor size > 10 cm and treatment schedule (group 1) were poor prognostic factors of PFS.

Conclusions: Our study supported the use of 2/1 schedule of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC because of lower toxicity profile and better efficacy with improved PFS in comparison to 4/2 schedule.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836283PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.102802DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

4/2 schedule
20
schedule
14
2/1 schedule
12
metastatic renal
8
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
sunitinib standard
8
patients metastatic
8
consecutive weeks
8
aes schedule
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!