Background: Debriefing is the reflective process following the simulation experience. We aimed to compare the debriefing assessment and debriefing satisfaction perceived by nursing students who underwent different debriefing methods.
Method: An experimental study conducted on three groups (instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing) was performed for 177 nursing students. Differences in the debriefing satisfaction were assessed using the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the Visual Analogue scale, and the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH).
Results: VAS scores for satisfaction differed significantly between the instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing groups. In the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the combined debriefing group was significantly higher compared with instructor-led debriefing. The total score for DASH was significantly higher in the combined debriefing group compared with instructor-led debriefing, and in instructor-led debriefing compared with peer debriefing.
Conclusion: Combining debriefing after a simulation session improves the debriefing satisfaction and the perceived debriefing assessment among nursing students. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):90-95.].
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210120-06 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The impact of virtual reality applied in nurse education on students' clinical thinking: A systematic review.
Nurse Educ Today
December 2024
Department of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, PR China. Electronic address:
Objective: To summarise and compare the applications and effectiveness of virtual reality in cultivating clinical thinking among nursing students and to further analyse the active ingredients of virtual reality applications.
Design: Systematic review.
Review Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted from the inception until 5th of February 2024.
Correction: Peer-led versus instructor-led structured debriefing in high-fidelity simulation: a mixedmethods study on teaching effectiveness.
BMC Med Educ
December 2024
School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, No. 1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Peer-led versus instructor-led structured debriefing in high-fidelity simulation: a mixed-methods study on teaching effectiveness.
BMC Med Educ
November 2024
School of nursing, Southern Medical University, No. 1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
Background: Debriefing is the essential element of simulation teaching. Peer-led structured debriefing simulations could be a suitable approach because of the peers' similarity in age and experience to the students. The purpose of this study was to compare the teaching effectiveness of peer-led debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing in high-fidelity simulation scenarios.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLearning with our peers: peer-led versus instructor-led debriefing for simulated crises, a randomized controlled trial.
Korean J Anesthesiol
April 2024
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background: Although peer-assisted learning is known to be effective for reciprocal learning in medical education, it has been understudied in simulation. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of peer-led compared to instructor-led debriefing for non-technical skill development in simulated crisis scenarios.
Methods: Sixty-one undergraduate medical students were randomized into the control group (instructor-led debriefing) or an intervention group (peer debriefer or peer debriefee group).
Fluctuating cohesion: A grounded theory study of nursing students engaged in a combined debriefing format.
Nurse Educ Pract
March 2024
University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Nursing, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.
Aim: This study explored the social processes enacted by nursing students when they engage in a combined format of structured peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing after in-person simulation. The aim was to gain insight into nursing students' perceptions and how peer processes influenced reflection and learning.
Background: Debriefing, a key component of clinical simulation, promotes development of nursing students' reflective processes and enhances learning.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!