Planning and Public Health professionals' experiences of using the planning system to regulate hot food takeaway outlets in England: A qualitative study.

Health Place

UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, England, UK.

Published: January 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Takeaway food outlets mainly offer limited seating and unhealthy, energy-dense food for consumption off-site.
  • National guidelines in England allow local policies to promote healthier food options by regulating these outlets, with around half of local governments implementing such measures.
  • Interviews with planning and public health professionals revealed support for these policies, highlighting facilitators like internal cooperation and existing examples of successful adoption, while also noting barriers such as criticisms of being overly controlling and challenges in proving effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Takeaway food outlets offer limited seating and sell hot food to be consumed away from their premises. They typically serve energy-dense, nutrient-poor food. National planning guidelines in England offer the potential for local planning policies to promote healthier food environments through regulation of takeaway food outlets. Around half of English local government areas use this approach, but little is known about the process of adoption. We aimed to explore experiences and perceived success of planning policy adoption. In 2018 we recruited Planning and Public Health professionals from 16 local government areas in England and completed 26 telephone interviews. We analysed data with a thematic analysis approach. Participants felt that planning policy adoption was appropriate and can successfully regulate takeaway food outlets with the intention to improve health. They identified several facilitators and barriers towards adoption. Facilitators included internal co-operation between Planning and Public Health departments, and precedent for planning policy adoption set elsewhere. Barriers included "nanny-state" criticism, and difficulty demonstrating planning policy effectiveness. These could be considered in future guidelines to support widespread planning policy adoption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613884PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102305DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

planning policy
20
policy adoption
16
planning public
12
public health
12
takeaway food
12
food outlets
12
planning
11
hot food
8
local government
8
government areas
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!