Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training with FES affected walking speed and trunk accelerometry-based gait characteristics in patients with subacute stroke, compared with FES or tDCS gait training only.
Materials And Methods: Stroke patients (n = 34; female 15; mean age, 72.5 ± 11.2 years; mean days poststroke, 38.7) with resultant paresis in the lower extremity (mean Fugl-Meyer score, 25.5) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: combined anodal tDCS and gait training with FES (tDCS+FES, n = 11), anodal tDCS with gait training (tDCS, n = 11), or combined sham tDCS and gait training with FES (FES, n = 12). Participants received the intervention for 20 minutes and a 40-minute conventional rehabilitative intervention daily for a week. Patients' walking ability was evaluated using walking speed, harmonic ratio (HR), autocorrelation coefficient (AC), and root mean square (RMS) along each axis using a wearable trunk accelerometer.
Results: The tDCS+FES group had a significantly greater change in AC in the anteroposterior axis and mediolateral axis than the FES and tDCS groups and FES group, respectively. There were no significant effects on walking speed or other parameters (HR and RMS) among the groups.
Conclusions: The combination of anodal tDCS and gait training with FES improved the post-stroke patients' gait regularity than FES gait training intervention only. Thus, combined tDCS and FES gait training, as a novel intervention, could be an important therapeutic tool in improving walking performance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105635 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!