A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Trunk Acceleration During Walking in Patients with Subacute Stroke. | LitMetric

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training with FES affected walking speed and trunk accelerometry-based gait characteristics in patients with subacute stroke, compared with FES or tDCS gait training only.

Materials And Methods: Stroke patients (n = 34; female 15; mean age, 72.5 ± 11.2 years; mean days poststroke, 38.7) with resultant paresis in the lower extremity (mean Fugl-Meyer score, 25.5) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: combined anodal tDCS and gait training with FES (tDCS+FES, n = 11), anodal tDCS with gait training (tDCS, n = 11), or combined sham tDCS and gait training with FES (FES, n = 12). Participants received the intervention for 20 minutes and a 40-minute conventional rehabilitative intervention daily for a week. Patients' walking ability was evaluated using walking speed, harmonic ratio (HR), autocorrelation coefficient (AC), and root mean square (RMS) along each axis using a wearable trunk accelerometer.

Results: The tDCS+FES group had a significantly greater change in AC in the anteroposterior axis and mediolateral axis than the FES and tDCS groups and FES group, respectively. There were no significant effects on walking speed or other parameters (HR and RMS) among the groups.

Conclusions: The combination of anodal tDCS and gait training with FES improved the post-stroke patients' gait regularity than FES gait training intervention only. Thus, combined tDCS and FES gait training, as a novel intervention, could be an important therapeutic tool in improving walking performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105635DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gait training
36
tdcs gait
24
training fes
16
walking speed
12
anodal tdcs
12
gait
11
fes
10
training
9
tdcs
9
transcranial direct
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!