Utilisation patterns of group O red blood cell transfusion by ABO and D non-identical recipients in large academic hospital.

Transfus Clin Biol

Clinical Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation biology, University Hospital Centre of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; University of Applied Health Sciences of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Split, Croatia.

Published: May 2021

Objectives: Several studies have raised concerns that transfusion of O red blood cells (RBCs) to ABO and D non-identical recipients can intensify group O inventory shortages. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse particular clinical indications and polices responsible for O RBCs use by ABO and D non-identical recipients, as well as to assess the impact of this practice on the overall utilisation of O RBCs.

Material And Methods: Data of all transfused RBCs from 2014 to 2018 were extracted from the comprehensive database of transfusion service. Extracted variables included date of transfusion, ABO and D group of the transfused RBCs and recipients, recipient's demographic, and specific characteristics regarding transfusion requirements.

Results: Over a 5-year period, 124,220 RBCs were transfused: 38,962 (31.4%) group O D+ and 9109 (7.3%) group O D-. ABO and D non-identical recipient received 4842 (10.1%) of all administered O RBCs: 2880 (7.4%) of all transfused O D+ and 1962 (21.5%) of all transfused O D- RBCs. The common indications for this practice were: ABO and D mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (52.5%), infants under the age of 4 months (18.6%), shortage of ABO identical RBCs (9.0%), phenotype-matched RBCs (8,1%), and urgent transfusion (7.2%).

Conclusions: A significant proportion of O RBCs was transfused to ABO and D non-identical recipients, mainly due to transfusion of ABO and D mismatched HSCT recipients. However, the proportion of all transfused RBCs O D+ and especially O D- remained relatively low.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abo non-identical
20
non-identical recipients
16
transfused rbcs
16
transfusion abo
12
rbcs
11
abo
9
red blood
8
rbcs abo
8
rbcs transfused
8
abo mismatched
8

Similar Publications

ABO-non-identical (ni) platelets provide less of an increase in platelet count and may increase the length of patient transfusions. The paper by Han and Badami showed that ABO-ni platelets may be a risk factor for immune platelet transfusion refractoriness. Commentary on: Han et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ABO non-identical platelet transfusions, immune platelet refractoriness and platelet support.

Br J Haematol

May 2024

Clinical Department, New Zealand Blood Service, Christchurch, New Zealand.

ABO-non-identical (ABO-ni) platelets may be another risk factor for immune platelet transfusion refractoriness (i-PTR). We examined the effect of such platelets on i-PTR and subsequent platelet support through retrospective analysis of 17 322 New Zealand patients receiving ≥1 platelets. Immune PTR was defined as PTR with anti-HLA-I/HPA positivity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hemolysis is a positive agglutination reaction and is primarily associated with high anti-A or anti-B antibody titers. This high titer may result in no agglutination due to the "prozone" phenomenon. Platelet concentrate of high titer has an adverse effect on the recipient of the non-identical ABO blood group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Due to platelet availability limitations, platelet units ABO mismatched to recipients are often transfused. However, since platelets express ABO antigens and are collected in plasma which may contain ABO isohemagglutinins, it remains controversial as to whether ABO non-identical platelet transfusions could potentially pose harm and/or have reduced efficacy.

Study Design And Methods: The large 4-year publicly available Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) database was used to investigate patient outcomes associated with ABO non-identical platelet transfusions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction And Objectives: It is challenging to adopt a policy of ABO identical platelet transfusion in hemato-oncological patients because of the high demand. Moreover, there are no global standards for the management of ABO non-identical platelet transfusions due to limited evidence. The current study compared the impact of dose and storage duration of platelets on percent platelet recovery (PPR) at 1 h and 24 h between ABO identical and ABO non-identical platelet transfusions in hemato-oncological conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!