A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A rigorous approach to optimal profile design for acoustic black holes. | LitMetric

A rigorous approach to optimal profile design for acoustic black holes.

J Acoust Soc Am

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark.

Published: January 2021

Calculus of variations is used to determine a profile shape for an acoustic black hole without a layer of viscoelastic dampening material with fixed parameters of geometry (i.e., length, maximal and minimal thickness), which minimizes the reflection coefficient, without violating the underlying assumptions of existence for acoustic black holes. The additional constraint imposed by keeping the normalized wave number variation (NWV) small everywhere in the acoustic black hole is handled by the use of Lagrange multipliers. From this method, closed-form expressions for the optimal profile, its reflection coefficient, and the NWV are derived. Additionally, it is shown that in the special case where only the NWV (and not the reflection coefficient) is considered, the optimal profile reduces to the well-known thickness profile for acoustic black holes, h(x)=ϵx. We give a numerical example of the difference between an acoustic black hole with optimal profile and classical profile, h(x)=ϵx, m > 2. For close to identical reflection coefficients, the optimal profile vastly outperforms the classical profile in terms of having low NWV at a large range of frequencies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0003337DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acoustic black
24
optimal profile
20
black holes
12
black hole
12
reflection coefficient
12
profile
9
classical profile
8
acoustic
6
black
6
optimal
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!