A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Control of and Pathogenic Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments. | LitMetric

Control of and Pathogenic Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments.

Microorganisms

Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.

Published: January 2021

This study compared a novel non-formaldehyde combination product developed for pathogen control in animal feed Finio (A), with a panel of three commonly used organic acid feed additive products: Fysal (B), SalCURB K2 (C) and Salgard (D). Products were evaluated for their ability to reduce Typhimurium DT104 and avian pathogenic in poultry feed. A commercial layer-hen mash was treated with each product and then mixed with feed previously contaminated (via inoculated meat and bone meal) with either or After 24 hours at room temperature, 10 replicate samples were taken from each preparation and plate counts were performed using a selective agar. All concentrations of product A (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 kg per metric tonne (MT)) plus the higher concentration of products B and D (6.0 kg MT) significantly reduced counts compared with those in the untreated control group ( < 0.05). Product C did not significantly reduce levels of under these conditions. Because of the poor recovery of , statistical comparisons for this organism were limited in scope, but only product A at the highest concentration appeared to have eliminated it.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7911812PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

animal feed
8
feed
5
product
5
control pathogenic
4
pathogenic contamination
4
contamination animal
4
feed alternatives
4
alternatives formaldehyde-based
4
formaldehyde-based treatments
4
treatments study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!