Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: In 2018, the General Dental Council introduced reflective practice as part of an Enhanced Continuing Professional Development (ECPD) system, mandatory for registrants in the United Kingdom. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate dental professionals' perceptions and practice of reflection and to explore the benefits of an evidence-informed reflective practice learning course.
Material And Methods: This study was conducted at two dental schools in the United Kingdom (UK). A short course on reflective practice which included pre- and post-course surveys, using closed- and open-ended questions, was afforded to dental professionals attending Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0 software, and responses to open-ended questions were explored by content analysis.
Results: Fifty-two dentists attending the short course provided responses; the majority were female (73%, n = 38) and internationally qualified (60%, n = 31). The pre-course questionnaire revealed that the majority of participants (94%; n = 49) considered reflection as part of their professional practice, with 55% (n = 29) reporting doing so daily. Most (88%; n = 46) had received no formal training. The post-course questionnaire revealed that 88% (n = 46) found the course useful as it gave a "systematic and schematic" approach enhancing the participants' understanding of reflective practice.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that a theoretically informed short course on reflective practice was welcomed by participants who showed a strong interest in learning how to reflect supported by mentors. This pilot provides the basis for further research on reflective practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12667 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!