A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Usefulness of an artificial intelligence system for the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma evaluated with videos simulating overlooking situation. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study assessed an AI system's ability to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by using videos that simulate missed detection scenarios, addressing limitations of previous research on validation methods.
  • - The AI was developed with a large dataset, including images from both cancerous and noncancerous esophageal conditions, and was evaluated against the performance of endoscopists using both regular and AI-assisted video.
  • - Results showed that the AI had an 85.7% sensitivity in detecting ESCC but a lower specificity of 40%. Endoscopists improved their detection sensitivity from 75% to 77.7% with AI assistance, maintaining high specificity levels.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown favorable performance in the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, previous studies were limited by the quality of their validation methods. In this study, we evaluated the performance of an AI system with videos simulating situations in which ESCC has been overlooked.

Methods: We used 17,336 images from 1376 superficial ESCCs and 1461 images from 196 noncancerous and normal esophagi to construct the AI system. To record validation videos, the endoscope was passed through the esophagus at a constant speed without focusing on the lesion to simulate situations in which ESCC has been missed. Validation videos were evaluated by the AI system and 21 endoscopists.

Results: We prepared 100 video datasets, including 50 superficial ESCCs, 22 noncancerous lesions, and 28 normal esophagi. The AI system had sensitivity of 85.7% (54 of 63 ESCCs) and specificity of 40%. Initial evaluation by endoscopists conducted with plain video (without AI support) had average sensitivity of 75.0% (47.3 of 63 ESCC) and specificity of 91.4%. Subsequent evaluation by endoscopists was conducted with AI assistance, which improved their sensitivity to 77.7% (P = 0.00696) without changing their specificity (91.6%, P = 0.756).

Conclusions: Our AI system had high sensitivity for the detection of ESCC. As a support tool, the system has the potential to enhance detection of ESCC without reducing specificity. (UMIN000039645).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.13934DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

artificial intelligence
8
detection esophageal
8
esophageal squamous
8
squamous cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
videos simulating
8
situations escc
8
superficial esccs
8
normal esophagi
8
validation videos
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!