Outcome of valve sparing root replacement for diverse indications.

Scand Cardiovasc J

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates mid-term outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) in patients with conditions like bicuspid aortic valve and connective tissue disorders.
  • Over 4.8 years of follow-up for 174 patients, there was no thirty-day mortality, and high survival rates were reported, with 96% not needing reoperation at five years.
  • Findings show that complications like reoperation or valve dysfunction were not significantly affected by preexisting conditions, indicating that VSRR can be effective for various patient backgrounds.

Article Abstract

We report the mid-term outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) in a cohort including patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), connective tissue disorder (CTD), aortic dissection (AD), and congenital heart disease (CHD). . From 2005 to 2017, 174 patients underwent VSRR with the reimplantation technique. The mean age was 46 ± 14 years. The mean follow-up time was 4.8 ± 2.8 years. The indication for operation was aortic aneurysm for 127 (73%), aortic insufficiency (AI) for 38 (22%), and AD for 9 patients (5%). Preoperatively, 53 patients (31%) had ≥ moderate AI. BAV, CTD (Marfan or Loyes-Dietz), previous Ross procedure, or CHD was present in 57 (33%), 28 (16%), 7 (4%) and 12 patients (7%), respectively. Concomitant aortic valve repair was performed for 103 patients (59%). . Thirty-day mortality was zero. Four patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival, freedom from AVR, and freedom from ≥ moderate AI or reoperation were 96, 98, and 97% at 5 years. There was no difference in survival, freedom from AVR, or freedom from ≥ moderate AI or reoperation in patients with and without BAV, CTD, leaflet repair, or preoperative ≥ moderate AI. In Cox regression analysis, BAV, CTD, aortic valve repair, preoperative ≥ moderate AI, or aortic dimension were not risk factors for reoperation or valve dysfunction. . Mid-term outcomes of VSRR for patients with diverse indications in terms of survival, reoperation rate, and valve dysfunction rate were excellent in a center with a limited annual volume of VSSR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2020.1869298DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic valve
16
bav ctd
12
aortic
9
patients
9
root replacement
8
diverse indications
8
mid-term outcomes
8
ctd aortic
8
patients underwent
8
valve repair
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!