Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To investigate the glucose profile of women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by simultaneously analyzing several factors of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data.
Methods: CGM was conducted for 2 weeks in the second trimester of pregnant women whose random blood glucose level was ≥100 mg/dl. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed around day 7, and the index of hyperglycemia, relative hypoglycemia, and indices of glucose variability were extracted from CGM data. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed to categorize glucose profiles of the participants.
Results: CGM data were obtained from 29 women. Glucose profiles were categorized into three clusters: low glucose levels with less glucose variability group (L group, n = 7); moderate glucose levels with moderate-to-high glucose variability group (M group, n = 18); and high glucose levels with high glucose variability group (H group, n = 4). The waveforms of the glucose profiles were very different among the three groups. Women with GDM tended to be more frequent in the H group than in the M and L groups (75.0%, 16.7%, and 14.3%, respectively; p = 0.053). Maternal age was significantly higher and the proportion of multiparous women was significantly larger in the H group compared to L group (p = 0.002 and 0.015, respectively).
Conclusions: A comprehensive analysis of CGM data could help us extract a subgroup of women with characteristics of GDM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14677 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!