Background: The use of smartphones and multimedia messaging service (MMS) continues to increase in day to day orthopaedic clinical practice. However, there is limited evidence to support the safe utilisation of MMS.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to correlate the performance of MMS imaging to picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) imaging within the setting of diagnosis and management of ankle fractures.
Methods: The ankle fracture radiograph series of 82 consecutive patients were evaluated by five orthopaedic consultant specialists. A questionnaire regarding diagnosis and preferred management was completed separately for each patient using smartphone and PACS images. Statistical analysis was performed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Results: Ankle fracture diagnosis showed strong to excellent correlation both inter- and intraobserver MMS vs PACS when using the Weber (0.815, 0.988), Anatomical (0.858, 0.988), and AO classification systems (0.855, 0.985). MMS was less reliable than PACS in determining many management options.
Conclusion: The reliability of ankle fracture classification using MMS image viewing was not significantly different to interpretation on PACS workstations. Smartphone use in ankle fracture classification is supported by this study. Smartphone use was less accurate than PACS in devising management plans and future use should be limited to making only initial plans that must be corroberated with PACS and intraoperative findings prior to definitive fixation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.004 | DOI Listing |
Foot Ankle Surg
December 2024
Dept of Orthopaedics, Kings College Hospital MTC, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background: Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.
Methods: We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF).
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Orthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut University, Kasr Elini Street, Number 7, P.O. Box 110, Assuit, 71515, Egypt.
Aims: Which is the best extensile lateral (ELA) or sinus tarsi (STA) approach for osteosynthesis displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) is still debatable. The current RCT's primary objective was to compare the complications incidence after open reduction and internal fixation of DIACFs through STA vs. ELA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFoot Ankle Int
January 2025
University Hospital October 12, Madrid, Spain.
Background: The most commonly used classification for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures has not shown good reproducibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of a new classification system for such fractures.
Methods: The study involved the development of a novel classification system that categorized these fractures into 2 main types and 2 subtypes.
Cureus
November 2024
Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of three surgical management strategies for pilon fractures, including primary external fixation with delayed plating, external fixation with minimal internal fixation, and single-stage open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included 34 patients with complex intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia (AO-OTA type 43-C) treated between June 2018 and December 2019. Patients were managed surgically based on the local skin condition and swelling, employing either primary-stage external fixation with delayed plating (Group A), external fixation with minimal internal fixation (Group B), or single-stage ORIF with plating (Group C).
J Orthop Surg Res
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background: The traditional classification for lateral malleolus fracture has its limitations. In this study, we introduced a three-dimensional (3D) fracture mapping technique using computed tomography (CT) data to assess fracture line distributions and their impact on patient outcomes, offering a refined classification approach.
Methods: Retrospectively, we analysed 97 patients who underwent lateral malleolus fracture surgeries (2014-2019), using CT Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data to create 3D models and fracture maps.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!