AI Article Synopsis

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, gastroenterologists were required to wear N95 masks while performing procedures, prompting a study on the physiological effects of this protective gear.
  • In the study, many gastroenterologists experienced negative symptoms like difficulty breathing, fatigue, and headaches while using N95 masks, with a significant number showing elevated heart rates.
  • The research concluded that wearing N95 respirators leads to acute physiological changes and discomfort among healthcare providers, while alternative powered air-purifying respirators were better tolerated but still caused some issues.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) use was required while performing aerosol-generating procedures. We studied the physiologic effects of N95 FFR use in a cohort of gastroenterologists performing simulated colonoscopies.

Methods: Data collection and comparisons included (1) symptoms and change in vital signs in 12 gastroenterologists performing simulated colonoscopy for 60 minutes while wearing a surgical mask (SM) and faceshield (FS); N95 FFR, SM, and FS; and powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) and (2) respiratory belt plethysmography and continuous electrocardiographic frequency-based heart rate (HR) variability indices including very low frequency power (measures intracardiac sympathetic tone) and low frequency to high frequency ratios (intracardiac sympathetic to vagal ratio) in 11 gastroenterologists performing simulated colonoscopy while wearing an SM (15 minutes), N95 FFR and SM (60 minutes), and SM (15 minutes) in rapid sequence.

Results: Ten of 12 gastroenterologists (83%) reported symptoms with N95 FFR use, most commonly breathing difficulty, frustration, fatigue, and headache. Nine of these gastroenterologists (75%) had associated significant HR elevation. Respiratory peak to trough measurement showed a significant increase (F(2) = 7.543, P = .004) during the N95 FFR stage, which resolved after removal of the N95 FFR. Although not statistically different, all gastroenterologists showed a decrease in sympathetic to vagal ratios and an increase in intracardiac sympathetic effects in the N95 FFR stage. PAPR use was better tolerated but was associated with headache and elevated HR in 4 gastroenterologists (33%).

Conclusions: N95 FFR use by gastroenterologists is associated with development of acute physiologic changes and symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

n95 ffr
32
gastroenterologists performing
16
performing simulated
16
effects n95
12
simulated colonoscopy
12
intracardiac sympathetic
12
n95
10
gastroenterologists
9
ffr
9
acute physiologic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!