Systematic errors in phylogenetic trees.

Curr Biol

Centre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address:

Published: January 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The use of protein and nucleic acid sequences has dramatically improved our ability to reconstruct the tree of life, allowing scientists to analyze vast amounts of data.
  • Despite these advancements, the phylogenetic results are still often controversial due to conflicting findings from large studies, indicating that errors still persist.
  • These errors mainly stem from systematic biases in sequence evolution, which are recognized but require careful measures to minimize their impact on research outcomes.

Article Abstract

The effort to reconstruct the tree of life was revolutionized by the use of sequences of proteins and nucleic acids. Phylogenetic trees are now routinely inferred using hundreds of thousands of amino acid or nucleotide characters. It thus seems surprising that many aspects of the tree of life are still controversial; conflicting results between large scale phylogenomic studies show that errors remain common despite large datasets. These errors often result from systematic biases in the way sequences evolve. While the resulting systematic errors are well understood, it requires careful efforts to reduce their effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic errors
8
phylogenetic trees
8
tree life
8
errors phylogenetic
4
trees effort
4
effort reconstruct
4
reconstruct tree
4
life revolutionized
4
revolutionized sequences
4
sequences proteins
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!