The peer-review process is a form of self-regulation by qualified members of the profession to evaluate works done by one or more individuals. However, without a clear structure, the peer-review process can be problematic. Rubrics have been shown to increase peer reviewer satisfaction and author compliance, but only when they convey clear and specific descriptions for task-specific criteria. Sigma developed a peer-review rubric to provide consistency in judging scientific abstracts. An asynchronous provider-directed, provider-paced educational activity can be used to successfully educate peer reviewers on the benefit and use of a peer-review rubric. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(2):64-66.].

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20210114-04DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer reviewers
8
peer-review process
8
peer-review rubric
8
communicating expectations
4
expectations developing
4
developing rubric
4
rubric peer
4
peer-review
4
reviewers peer-review
4
process form
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!