Water management improvement in PEM fuel cells via addition of PDMS or APTES polymers to the catalyst layer.

Turk J Chem

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Atatürk University, Erzurum Turkey.

Published: October 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Water management is critical for the efficiency of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), affecting their performance due to humidity levels in the membrane.
  • Two hydrophobic polymers, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES), were tested in varying concentrations (5, 10, and 20 wt.%) within the catalyst layer, with performance evaluated through various characterization techniques like SEM and FTIR.
  • Fuel cells incorporating PDMS demonstrated superior performance over those with APTES, with specific optimal results noted at 5 wt.% APTES and 10 wt.% PDMS yielding notable current and power densities.

Article Abstract

Water management is one of the obstacles in the development and commercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Sufficient humidification of the membrane directly affects the PEM fuel cell performance. Therefore, 2 different hydrophobic polymers, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES), were tested at different percentages (5, 10, and 20 wt.%) in the catalyst layer. The solution was loaded onto the surface of a 25 BC gas diffusion layer (GDL) via the spraying method. The performance of the obtained fuel cells was compared with the performance of the commercial catalyst. Characterizations of each surface, including different amounts of PDMS and APTES, were performed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses. Molecular bond characterization was examined via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and surface hydrophobicity was measured via contact angle measurements. The performance of the fuel cells was evaluated at the PEM fuel cell test station and the 2 hydrophobic polymers were compared. Surfaces containing APTES were found to be more hydrophobic. Fuel cells with PDMS performed better when compared to those with APTES. Fuel cells with 5wt.% APTES with a current density of 321.31 mA/cm and power density of 0.191 W/cm , and 10wt.% PDMS with a current density of 344.52 mA/cm and power density of 0.205 W/cm were the best performing fuel cells at 0.6V.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751925PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/kim-2002-49DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fuel cells
28
pem fuel
12
fuel
9
water management
8
pdms aptes
8
catalyst layer
8
fuel cell
8
hydrophobic polymers
8
performance fuel
8
current density
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!