AI Article Synopsis
- The study explores Koreans’ attitudes toward life-sustaining treatments, revealing that more individuals prefer not to receive such treatments in terminal illness situations.
- Participants were surveyed in a Guro-gu dementia center, and results showed that those opting out often cited physical and mental distress as key factors influencing their decision.
- Psychological assessments indicated that those who opted out had higher anxiety and depression levels, alongside lower social support from family, highlighting the emotional complexities surrounding end-of-life choices.
Article Abstract
Objectives: Life-sustaining treatment is any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical conditions, and includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, haemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices. This study aimed to investigate the thoughts on life-sustaining treatment of Koreans and to assess the factors associated with deciding to not receive life-sustaining treatment if they develop a terminal disease.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Guro-gu centre for dementia from 1 May 2018 to 31 December 2019.
Participants: In total, 150 individuals participated in this study.
Outcome Measures: The questionnaire consisted of self-report items with some instructions, demographic characteristics, thoughts on life-sustaining treatment and psychosocial scales. The preferences of the participants were investigated on the assumption that they develop terminal cancer. The psychosocial scales included the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).
Results: We classified our participants into two groups: individuals who wanted to receive life-sustaining treatment (IRLT) and individuals who wanted to not receive life-sustaining treatment (INLT). There were twice as many participants in the INLT group than there were in the IRLT. In making this decision, the INLT group focused more on physical and mental distress. Additionally, 32.7% of participants responded that terminal status was an optimal time for this decision, but more participants want to decide it earlier. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly higher in the INLT group than in the IRLT group. However, the INLT group had significantly lower MSPSS family scores.
Conclusion: Our findings can help assess issues regarding advance directives and life-sustaining treatment, and will be a reference for designing future studies on this issue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831737 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!