Objectives: To define the learning process of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure through assessment of consecutive procedural metrics.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational cohort study was conducted of all consecutive Nuss procedures performed by individual surgeons without previous experience between June 2006 and December 2018. Surgeons were proctored during their initial 10 procedures. The learning process after the proctoring period was evaluated using nonrisk-adjusted cumulative sum (ie, observed minus expected) failure charts of complications. An acceptable and unacceptable complication rate of 10% and 20% were used. Logarithmic trend lines were used to assess over-time performance regarding operation time.

Results: Two-hundred twenty-two consecutive Nuss procedures by 3 general thoracic surgeons were evaluated. Cumulative sum charts showed an average performance from the first procedure after being proctored onward for all surgeons, whereas surgeon B demonstrated a statistically significant complication rate equal to or less than 10% after 59 cases. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses using a stricter acceptable and unacceptable complication rate of 6% and 12% also showed an average performance for all surgeons. Although, the median time between consecutive procedures ranged from 7 to 35 days, no frequency-outcome relationship was observed. In addition, surgeons required the same average operation time throughout their entire experience.

Conclusions: After a 10-procedure proctoring period, repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure is a safe procedure to adopt and perform without a typical (complication based) learning curve while performing at least 1 procedure per 35 days.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.154DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repair pectus
12
pectus excavatum
12
excavatum nuss
12
nuss procedure
12
complication rate
12
minimally invasive
8
invasive repair
8
learning curve
8
learning process
8
consecutive nuss
8

Similar Publications

Background: Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall defect and is characterized by the inward displacement of the sternum and costal cartilages. To date, there are limited data on adult patients undergoing the Nuss procedure for PE. This study aimed to assess the complication rate between the pediatric and adult populations and assess the trends in demographics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pectus excavatum (PE) can be associated with either congenital or acquired heart disease. This study highlights the importance of PE surgical repair in cases of severe chest depression on the heart in underlying cardiac diseases exacerbating cardiopulmonary impairment. From January 2023 to March 2024, four male patients underwent PE repair, having heart disease including pericarditis, mitral valve prolapse, ventricular fibrillation arrest and type 1 second-degree atrioventricular block.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of modified single-incision surgery with that of traditional modified Ravitch surgery for the repair of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients who underwent surgical correction for sternal depression from January 2015 to December 2020 across four major medical centers. Patients were categorized into two specific groups on the basis of the surgical technique employed: the modified single-incision surgery group, which comprised patients treated using the novel single-incision approach, and the traditional modified Ravitch surgery group, which included patients who received the conventional Ravitch surgery with multiple incisions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Regional anesthetic approach and surgical volume have been shown to outcomes in patients undergoing Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. However, their independent relationship is not described. We investigated how regional anesthesia and surgical volume are associated with length of stay (LOS), postoperative opioid use, operating room utilization, and complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) using dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption compared to traditional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair.
  • The study involved 84 patients, showing that those in the OSA group required significantly less morphine-equivalent medication and reported lower pain scores in the first 48 hours after surgery.
  • Recovery times and overall stability during the procedure were similar between the two groups, indicating that OSA is a safe and effective alternative to OBA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!