Background: Currently, transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty approach is the reference standard in the surgical reconstruction of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects. The approach is suitable for all but the most complex cases which might require abdominoperineal approach.
Aims: We reviewed our recent experience with transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty with respect to success rate and complications.
Patients And Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study carried out at Jos University Teaching Hospital from March 2015 to March 2018. The case notes of male patients who had transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects within the study period were retrieved. Patients' demographics, cause and nature of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects, the success rate, and complications were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 22.
Results: Sixteen men with mean age of 29.6 ± 7.8 years had transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD) during the study period. The mean defect gap length was 4.5 cm (range, 2-7 cm). Out of the 16 patients, 6 (37.5%) had simple transperineal urethroplasty, while 10 (62.5%) underwent a more extensive transperineal urethroplasty. Four patients (25%) had inferior pubectomy. A total of 7 (43.8%) patients had erectile dysfunction (ED) before and after the urethroplasty. Five (31.3%) patients had ED before the urethroplasty 2 (12.5%) patients developed ED after the surgery. After mean follow-up duration of 2 years (range, 1-4 years), 12 (75%) patients had satisfactory urinary stream. The mean Qmax for the 16 patients was 16 ml/s (range, 0-35 ml/s). The 12 (75%) patients that had no complaints of LUTS, had Qmax ≥ 15 ml/s at mean follow-up duration of 2 years.
Conclusion: Transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for PFUDD is considered suitable technique for treatment of PFUDD with good surgical outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_74_20 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Outcomes of transperineal reanastomosis as a salvage treatment for recurrent vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy.
Arch Ital Urol Androl
October 2024
Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Prof. W. Orlowski, Warsaw.
Purpose: To evaluate transperineal reanastomosis (TRPA) combined with incontinence surgery as a complex treatment for recurring vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 8 patients who underwent TRPA for recurring VUAS. Detailed preoperative and follow up data were assessed.
A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access.
Urologia
December 2024
Urology Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Background: Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArtificial urinary sphincter implantation after transperineal open reconstruction of post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.
Aging Male
December 2025
Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Purpose: This study evaluates the effectiveness of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation following transperineal reanastomosis in men with vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), focusing on long-term explantation rates and urinary continence.
Methods: Patients treated between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Those undergoing AUS implantation post-transperineal reanastomosis for recurrent VUAS, excluding cases with prior pelvic irradiation and overactive bladder, were included.
[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment].
Chirurgie (Heidelb)
December 2024
Abteilung für Proktologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) represent less than 5% of anorectal fistulas. The classification of RVF is based on the localization (low vs. high) and the etiology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrecise treatment of pelvic fracture urethral injury associated with urethrorectal fistula.
BJU Int
October 2024
Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of a new strategy of transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty (TAU) with proximal transection in treating pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) associated with urethrorectal fistula (URF).
Patients And Methods: A retrospective review of all patients treated by TAU with proximal transection and fistula repair for PFUI associated with URF was performed between August 2013 and July 2022. Information on demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative follow-up outcomes was collected.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!