AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how tumor genomic prognostic assays, specifically the DCIS score, influenced treatment decisions for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who underwent breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2016.
  • Out of 141,047 DCIS patients, only 3% had a DCIS score assessed, with the percentage increasing over the years, particularly among those with more favorable tumor characteristics.
  • Results revealed that patients with low-risk DCIS scores received significantly less radiation compared to those with higher-risk scores, demonstrating the DCIS score's potential to guide treatment de-escalation.

Article Abstract

Background: Tumor genomic prognostic assays estimate 10-year local recurrence risk in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and can guide treatment decisions. This study aimed to evaluate which DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) underwent DCIS score genomic testing and the influence of the results on adjuvant treatment recommendations.

Methods: The study identified patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who had DCIS treated with BCS from 2010 to 2016.

Results: Of 141,047 patients, 4255 (3%) had a DCIS score assessed, 0.3% in 2010 increasing to 5.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The patients most likely to undergo DCIS score assessment had more favorable tumor features in the multivariable analysis. The DCIS score result was documented for 91.4% of the tested patients (n = 3888): 70.5% of the low-risk, 14.9% of the intermediate-risk, and 14.6% of the high-risk patients. The patients with low-risk scores were less likely to have radiation than those with intermediate- or high-risk scores among the patients with either ER + (35.0% vs 71.0% or 81.1%) or ER- disease (48.1% vs 77.0% or 85.5%) (each p ≤ 0.001). The patients who had ER + disease with high- and intermediate-risk scores were most commonly treated with both radiation and hormone therapy (HT) (57.1% and 52.2%), whereas the most common treatment for those with a low-risk DCIS score was HT alone without radiation (37.1%). Comparison of genomic testing with clinicopathologic features showed an independent influence of genomic testing on treatment.

Conclusions: Use of the DCIS score increased over time, predominantly for favorable DCIS. Patients with a low-risk score were significantly less likely to receive radiation, supporting an impact of the DCIS score on treatment de-escalation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09517-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ductal carcinoma
8
carcinoma situ
8
dcis score
8
dcis
5
twelve-gene recurrence
4
recurrence score
4
score ductal
4
situ influence
4
influence receipt
4
receipt adjuvant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!