In order to compare different criteria in the interpretation of stress radionuclide angiography (SRNA) 96 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were investigated by both SRNA and coronary arteriography. The result of coronary arteriography was taken as the gold standard for the diagnosis of CAD. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at each step of the stress study using the equilibrium radionuclide technique. The diagnostic value of eight interpretation criteria based on the evolution of global LVEF during stress were compared with each other, using the ROC technique. The best diagnostic criterion proved to be the normalized increase of LVEF proposed by Goris. The most commonly used criteria, LVEF increase and LVEF measured at maximal exercise, were not optimal. In the whole population of patients, the best criterion had a sensitivity of 85% for a specificity of 80% and a specificity of 83% for a sensitivity of 80%. In the population, following exclusion of patients with preceding myocardial infarction, the specificity was 74% for a sensitivity of 80% and a sensitivity of 74% for a specificity of 80%. Thus, the choice of interpretation criteria is very important in order to optimize the sensitivity and specificity of this diagnostic test.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interpretation criteria
12
stress radionuclide
8
radionuclide angiography
8
coronary artery
8
artery disease
8
criteria order
8
coronary arteriography
8
lvef measured
8
increase lvef
8
specificity 80%
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!