Do not exchange the spacer during staged TKA exchange!

J Orthop

Julius-Maximilians-University Wuerzburg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstrasse 11, D-97074, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Published: December 2020

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the reinfection rate and risk factors for septic failure after two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infections of primary total knee arthroplasties. Reinfections should be classified as new infection or as infection recurrence after two-stage exchange.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 60 knees with chronic periprosthetic joint infections. Follow-up information was extracted from the departments electronic database.

Results: The reinfection rate after a mean follow-up of 35.6 months (1-135) was 20.0%. The only significant risk factor for reinfection was spacer exchange during two-stage exchange (OR = 10.42; p = 0.001). Of the 12 cases with reinfection 6 cases were classified as new infection and 2 as infection recurrence.

Conclusions: Patient specific factors for reinfection remain furtive. If a spacer exchange is preformed, the risk of reinfection increases. Culture results indicate that the benefit of spacer exchanges during two-stage exchange is highly questionable, particularly because reinfection is an issue of new infection rather than of infection recurrence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797487PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

two-stage exchange
12
infection infection
12
reinfection rate
8
chronic periprosthetic
8
periprosthetic joint
8
joint infections
8
classified infection
8
infection recurrence
8
spacer exchange
8
reinfection
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!