Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to identify a folate receptor-α (FRα)-selective PET agent potentially suitable for the selection of patients who might profit from FRα-targeted therapies. The 6 and 6 isomers of F-aza-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (MTHF) were assessed regarding their binding to FRα and FRβ, expressed on cancer and inflammatory cells, respectively, and compared with F-AzaFol, the folic acid-based analog. FR selectivity was investigated using FRα-transfected (RT16) and FRβ-transfected (D4) CHO cells. The cell uptake of F-folate tracers was investigated, and receptor-binding affinities were determined with the nonradioactive analogs. In vitro autoradiography of the F-folate tracers was performed using RT16 and D4 tissue sections. Biodistribution studies and PET/CT imaging of the radiotracers were performed on mice bearing RT16 and D4 xenografts. The uptake of F-6-aza-5-MTHF was high when using RT16 cells (62% ± 10% of added activity) but much lower when using D4 cells (5% ± 2%). The FRα selectivity of F-6-aza-5-MTHF was further demonstrated by its approximately 43-fold higher binding affinity to FRα (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC], 1.8 ± 0.1 nM) than to FRβ (IC, 77 ± 27 nM). The uptake of F-6-aza-5-MTHF and F-AzaFol was equal in both cell lines (52%-70%), with similar affinities to FRα (IC, 2.1 ± 0.4 nM and 0.6 ± 0.3 nM, respectively) and FRβ (0.8 ± 0.2 nM and 0.3 ± 0.1 nM, respectively). The autoradiography signal obtained with F-6-aza-5-MTHF was 11-fold more intense for RT16 than for D4 tissue sections. Biodistribution data showed high uptake of F-6-aza-5-MTHF in RT16 xenografts (81% ± 20% injected activity per gram [IA]/g 1 h after injection) but significantly lower accumulation in D4 xenografts (7.3% ± 2.1% IA/g 1 h after injection), which was also visualized using PET. The uptake of F-6-aza-5-MTHF and F-AzaFol was similar in RT16 (53% ± 10% IA/g and 45% ± 2% IA/g, respectively) and D4 xenografts (77% ± 10% IA/g and 52% ± 7% IA/g, respectively). This study demonstrated FRα selectivity for F-6-aza-5-MTHF but not for F-6-aza-5-MTHF or F-AzaFol. This characteristic, together with its favorable tissue distribution, makes F-6-aza-5-MTHF attractive for clinical translation to enable detection of FRα-positive cancer while preventing undesired accumulation in FRβ-expressing inflammatory cells.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724891 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.255760 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!