Objective: To analyse all available evidence to validate the effectiveness of a local intervention in the treatment of dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors (BCS).
Methods: We searched the Institute of Scientific Information Web of Knowledge, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for all articles published in peer-reviewed journals up to April 2019. The PICOS standards were: (population) BCS with dyspareunia; (intervention) any type of vulvovaginal treatment; (main outcome) frequency and severity of dyspareunia; (study design) clinical studies.
Results: The literature search strategy identified 252 articles, of which 233 were excluded at various stages of the search. Finally, we systematically reviewed 19 studies, 8 with local hormonal therapies, 7 with local non-hormonal therapies, 3 with laser therapy, and 1 with other interventions. Of the studies, 7 were randomized control trials and 11 were prospective observations. Most of the interventions were shown to be effective and safe in the improvement of dyspareunia.
Conclusion: In addition to the traditional options already analysed in other current reviews, other interesting options are highlighted (such as laser or local dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA]). Further work on dyspareunia should make use of high-quality trials with large numbers of samples to obtain evidence that could adequately demonstrate key methodological characteristics and harmful effects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768121 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000506148 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!