A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Frequency-specific Electrocochleography and Traveling Wave Time as a Clinical Test for Menière's Disease. | LitMetric

Introduction: Menière's disease is a clinical entity with no definitive objective testing. It has been hypothesized that underlying endolymphatic hydrops stiffens the basilar membrane leading to increased speed of the acoustic stimulus, therefore traveling wave velocity has been proposed as an objective test to aid in the diagnosis. The objective of this study is to compare electrocochleography frequency-specific action potential latency, basilar membrane traveling wave time, and summation to action potential (SP/AP) ratio in Menière's and non-Menière's patients.

Methods: Tympanic electrocochleography was performed with frequency-specific action potential latency time and SP/AP ratio recorded. Patient demographics, symptoms, audiogram data, AAO-HNS classification of Menière's disease, management interventions, and follow-up were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcome measures across patient groups, demographics, and clinical data.

Results: Ninety-one patients (182 ears) were included. There was a significant difference between a "definite" Menière's diagnosis and an "unlikely" or "probable" diagnosis by an average of 13 dB HL for the pure-tone thresholds at 250 Hz on the affected side (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in pure-tone thresholds at any other frequency, AP latency at any frequency, or AP/SP ratio between the different Menière's classification groups.

Conclusions: Our study fails to show significance of the traveling wave velocity as an objective test for Menière's disease. A significant correlation was found with low-frequency hearing loss between AAO-HNS Menière's classification groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

traveling wave
16
menière's disease
16
action potential
12
wave time
8
menière's
8
test menière's
8
basilar membrane
8
wave velocity
8
objective test
8
frequency-specific action
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!