Background: Rockwood I and II acromioclavicular joint injuries are generally treated nonoperatively. The long-term outcome is considered to be good but has not yet been properly investigated.

Purpose: To assess the long-term outcome after nonoperative therapy for Rockwood I and II acromioclavicular joint injuries regarding functional and radiologic outcome.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Eligible patients visited the emergency department between January 2003 and December 2015 and were ≥16 years old at the time of presentation. The main study parameters were the Constant score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the Simple Shoulder Test. The Constant score was measured in the injured and contralateral shoulders. Radiologic outcomes in both shoulders included joint displacement, joint space, degenerative changes, osteolysis of the distal clavicle, and ossification of the ligaments.

Results: A total of 75 patients were included for follow-up. After a median follow-up of 85 months (interquartile range [IQR], 68.0-100.0), the mean Constant score in the injured shoulder for the total sample was 88.6 (SD, 12.7) as compared with 93.3 (SD, 8.7) in the contralateral shoulder, with a significant difference of 4.7 points between shoulders. The median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 4.2 (IQR, 0.0-10.8), and the median Simple Shoulder Test was 100 (IQR, 91.7-100.0). The median patient satisfaction for the injured shoulder was 83 (IQR, 70.0-95.0). Regarding radiologic outcomes, for the injured shoulder versus the contralateral shoulder, patients had similar rates of degeneration (44% vs 46%) but more frequent osteolysis of the distal clavicle (31% vs 0%), ossification of the ligaments (29% vs 7%), and deformity of the distal clavicle (19% vs 0%).

Conclusion: Despite the frequent occurrence of radiographic changes, long-term functional outcome after Rockwood I and II acromioclavicular joint injuries is good, with only clinically nonrelevant functional differences between the injured and contralateral shoulders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546520981993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rockwood acromioclavicular
16
acromioclavicular joint
16
joint injuries
16
long-term outcome
12
constant score
12
distal clavicle
12
injured shoulder
12
shoulder
9
outcome nonoperative
8
disabilities arm
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Clavicle fractures are common in emergency departments, while acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are rare and even more so when combined with clavicle fractures.
  • A 29-year-old male patient experienced both an AC joint dislocation and a midshaft clavicle fracture, leading to surgical treatment that resulted in excellent recovery and range of motion after one year.
  • The case highlights the rarity of this combination of injuries and stresses the importance of timely diagnosis and investigation to achieve favorable functional outcomes, although there's still no agreement on the best treatment approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compares the outcomes of nonoperative treatment versus arthroscopically assisted stabilization for patients with acute Rockwood type 5 acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
  • 48 patients treated nonoperatively and 48 matched patients who underwent surgery were evaluated for clinical and radiological outcomes over an average follow-up of 62 months.
  • Results showed that the nonoperative group had better Constant scores and lower pain levels, while the surgical group had greater stability issues post-surgery compared to their initial condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this article, we aim to review the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury by mainly describing the progress of surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint injury, providing a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Acromioclavicular joint injury is a common sports injury, which is more common in male than in female patients. The mechanism of the injury is mainly caused by direct or indirect violence, which can be clearly diagnosed by radiography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CLR) technique, popular for treating acromioclavicular joint dislocations, has potential complications like clavicle and coracoid fractures, and implant failures, prompting a study on clavicular tunnel widening (CTW).
  • A retrospective analysis of 84 patients from a larger group who underwent single-bundle CLR provided data on post-operative measures, including CT width and coracoclavicular distance at 6 months.
  • The findings indicated that both CT width and coracoclavicular distance increased significantly by the 6-month follow-up, but no notable differences in CTW were observed based on factors like sex, injury causes, or Rockwood classification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!