Burnout and distress among allied health care professionals in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.

CMAJ Open

Division of Vascular Surgery (Rubin), Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network; Goldfarb Intelligence Marketing (Goldfarb), Toronto, Ont.; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (Satele), Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Rochester, Minn.; Office of Professional Practice & Policy (Graham), Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.

Published: July 2021

Background: Burnout and distress negatively affect the well-being of health care professionals and the treatment they provide. Our aim was to measure the prevalence of burnout and distress among allied health care staff at a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network in Canada, and compare outcomes to those for nonphysician employees in the United States.

Methods: We conducted a survey of allied health care staff, including physical, respiratory and occupational therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dietitians and speech-language pathologists, in a cardiovascular centre at 2 quaternary referral hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, between Nov. 27, 2018, and Jan. 31, 2019. The survey tool included the Well-Being Index (WBI), which measures fatigue, depression, burnout, anxiety or stress, quality of life, work-life integration, meaning in work and overall distress; a score of 2 or higher indicated high distress. We carried out standard univariate statistical comparisons using the χ, Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate to perform univariate comparisons in the sample of respondents. We assessed the relation between a WBI score of 2 or higher and demographic characteristics. We compared univariate associations among WBI data for nonphysician employees in the US who completed the WBI to responses from our participants.

Results: The response rate to the survey was 86% (45/52). Thirty-three respondents (73%) reported experiencing burnout in the previous month, and 31 (69%) reported emotional problems. Compared to respondents who perceived fair treatment in the workplace, those who perceived unfair treatment (20 [44%]) were more likely to report emotional problems (17 [85%] v. 13 [54%], = 0.05), to worry that work was hardening them emotionally (15 [75%] v. 8 [33%], = 0.008), and to feel down, depressed or hopeless (12 [60%] v. 4 [17%], = 0.005). Twenty-five respondents (56%) and 13 respondents (29%) reported WBI scores consistent with high (≥ 2) or severe (≥ 5) distress, respectively. Respondents were more likely to have a high WBI score if they perceived unfair treatment or inadequate staffing levels. Our respondents had a higher prevalence of burnout (73.3% v. 53.6%, = 0.008) and a higher average WBI score (2.6 [SD 2.8] v. 1.7 [SD 2.6], = 0.05) than 9096 nonphysician employees in the US.

Interpretation: The prevalence of burnout, emotional problems and distress was high among allied health care staff. Fair treatment in the workplace and adequate staffing may lower distress levels and improve the work experience of these health care professionals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7843078PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
24
allied health
16
burnout distress
12
care professionals
12
cardiovascular centre
12
centre quaternary
12
prevalence burnout
12
care staff
12
nonphysician employees
12
wbi score
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!