With an ever-increasing number of revisions, the surgeons will be faced with the dilemma of choosing the right implant for the revision knee. The soft tissue viability governs the choice of an implant at the time of revision. The selection ranges from the cruciate-retaining to the rotating/fixed hinge implants. The surgeon needs to plan preoperatively, but usually, the final decisions are made intraoperative. As determining the amount of constraint necessary can be challenging, we have tried to lay down a few pointers, which would help to make that choice. The posterior stabilized implants can manage most revision knees; in certain situations where they cannot accommodate the flexion-extension gap imbalance, a varus-valgus constrained implant should be used. The rotating hinge implants are used for severe instabilities or loss of soft tissue or bone around the knee. The use of a higher constraint implant has its consequences like reduced life span and reduced function. Thus it is crucial to use the least amount of constraint as necessary - however, as much as required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779836PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

soft tissue
8
hinge implants
8
amount constraint
8
implant
5
options limitations
4
limitations implant
4
constraint
4
implant constraint
4
constraint ever-increasing
4
ever-increasing number
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!