Poor glycemic control in bariatric patients: a reason to delay or a reason to proceed?

Surg Obes Relat Dis

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. Electronic address:

Published: April 2021

Background: More than 90% of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have obesity, and over 85% of diabetic patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) will see improvement or resolution of diabetes. However, diabetes is a known risk factor for surgical complications.

Objectives: To determine whether poor preoperative glycemic control confers an increased perioperative risk after MBS.

Setting: Academic Hospital.

Methods: Retrospective review of data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). From the 2017-2018 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients with diabetes who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or gastric sleeve surgery. Unmatched and propensity-matched univariate analyses, as well as multivariate logistic regressions, were performed to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes and complication rates between patients with poor (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1C] > 7.0) and good (HbA1C ≤ 7.0) glycemic control.

Results: Of 40,132 T2D patients, 19,094 (52.42%) had an HbA1C level ≤ 7.0. Patients with poor glycemic control had slightly higher rates of overall morbidity (6.53% versus 5.49%, respectively; relative risk = 1.188; P < .001). However, in a 1:1 matched analysis of 23,930 patients controlling for body mass index, surgery type, approach, and co-morbidities, the findings of poorer outcomes were largely mitigated. In a multivariate analysis, poor glycemic control was not associated with morbidity.

Conclusions: In T2D patients, poor glycemic control does not independently increase the risk of 30-day morbidity following MBS. Adverse outcomes in the setting of poor glycemic control appear to be largely mediated by associated co-morbidities. Performing MBS in the setting of suboptimal glycemic control may be justified, with the understanding that delaying or refusing surgery can contribute to worsening of diabetes-related co-morbidities that, in turn, may ultimately have a more deleterious effect on outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.11.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glycemic control
28
poor glycemic
20
patients poor
12
patients
9
metabolic bariatric
8
bariatric surgery
8
t2d patients
8
poor
7
control
7
glycemic
7

Similar Publications

The benefits of using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized patients with diabetes remain uncertain. Point-of-care (POC) glucose testing is the standard of care in this setting. We compared the effect of adding CGM to POC testing versus POC testing alone on glycemic outcomes in this population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide in Asians and Non-Asians Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diabetes Ther

January 2025

First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Key Laboratory of Rheumatic Disease and Translational Medicine, Shandong Institute of Nephrology, Jinan, China.

Introduction: More than half of diabetes patients are Asians, and their tolerance to antidiabetic drugs may differ from that of non-Asians. Oral semaglutide has recently gained attention for its advantages in glycemic and body weight control. However, its effects across different ethnic groups remain unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This analysis aimed to investigate diabetes-specific psychological outcomes among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed-loop (HCL) versus standard therapy.

Research Design And Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, adults with T1D were allocated to 26 weeks of HCL (MiniMed™ 670G) or standard therapy (insulin pump or multiple daily injections without real-time continuous glucose monitoring). Psychological outcomes (awareness and fear of hypoglycemia; and diabetes-specific positive well-being, diabetes distress, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL)) were measured at enrollment, mid-trial and end-trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glycated Hemoglobin and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Without Diabetes.

J Clin Med

December 2024

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Jordana 38 St., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the most critical public health problems in the contemporary world because they are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most substantial risk factors for developing CVDs. Glycated hemoglobin is a product of the non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin present in erythrocytes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) might provide immediate feedback regarding lifestyle choices such as diet and physical activity (PA). The impact of dietary habits and physical activity can be demonstrated in real time by providing continuous data on glucose levels and enhancing patient engagement and adherence to lifestyle modifications. Originally developed for diabetic patients, its use has recently been extended to a non-diabetic population to improve cardiovascular health.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!