Background/objectives: The Arclight is a novel, low-cost, solar-powered direct ophthalmoscope developed for low resource settings as an alternative to more expensive, conventional devices. The Brückner reflex test (BRT) is a quick and effective means to screen for eye disease and amblyogenic risk factors. This test is however rarely performed in low resource settings due to the lack of access to ophthalmoscopes and trained health care workers. Our aim was to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the BRT when performed by a non-expert using an Arclight and compare to an expert as well as the results of a full clinic workup.
Subjects/methods: In this prospective, blinded study, 64 patients referred to a paediatric ophthalmology clinic had the BRT performed by a 'non-expert' observer (medical student) then an 'expert' observer (consultant ophthalmologist). These results were then compared against the 'gold standard' outcomes of a full clinical workup.
Results: BRT screening by the expert observer led to a sensitivity of 75.0% [95% CI: 57.9-86.8%] and a specificity of 90.6% [95% CI: 75.8-96.8%] in picking up media opacity, strabismus, refractive error or a combination of the above. For the non-expert, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.9% [95% CI: 54.6-84.4%] and 84.4% [95% CI: 68.3-93.1%], respectively.
Conclusions: The Arclight can be effectively used to perform the BRT and identify eye disease and common amblyogenic risk factors. Even when performed by a non-expert the results are highly specific and moderately sensitive. This study consequently offers support for the use of this low-cost ophthalmoscope in the expansion of eye screening by health care workers in low resource settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526590 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01341-9 | DOI Listing |
Strabismus
November 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
: To assess refractive amblyopia risk factors in Lebanese children aged 3 to 6 years through school-based automated vision screenings, comparing outcomes between public and private schools. : A school-based vision screening was conducted across multiple regions in Lebanon, including 990 children aged 3 to 6 years from both public and private schools. Trained personnel utilized the Plusoptix S12 photoscreener for vision screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSaudi J Ophthalmol
February 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Qassim University, Buraydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to present the outcomes of vision and amblyogenic risk factor (ARF) screening in kindergarten children in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an optometrist conducted first-level screening in a kindergarten using a spot screener (Welch Allyn) in 2023. Refractive status and ocular alignment were evaluated.
Cureus
August 2024
Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Bibinagar, IND.
J AAPOS
October 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address:
Purpose: To describe the prevalence and risk factors associated with amblyogenic refractive error in children with Coats disease.
Methods: The medical records of children (<18 years of age) with unilateral Coats disease treated at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, ocular examinations, and treatments.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther
April 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Biruni University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Purpose: This research evaluates the effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) before and after cycloplegia to detect amblyogenic refractive errors in children.
Methods: Children ages 3 to 10 years old were screened by the SVS before and after cycloplegia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, paired t-test, Bland-Altman plot and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve were evaluated by comparing the results of the SVS (v3.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!