AI Article Synopsis

  • Warts are a common viral skin infection, and treatment methods vary widely, with intralesional (IL) immunotherapy emerging as a promising option.
  • Three treatment groups were evaluated: IL MMR vaccine, IL tuberculin, and intradermal (ID) BCG vaccination in 60 patients over 6 months.
  • Results showed that ID BCG vaccination was the most effective, with a 70% complete response, whereas IL MMR vaccine had a lower success rate and raised concerns about safety.

Article Abstract

Background: Warts are common viral infection of the skin. Treating warts are still an ongoing challenge and no general agreement is reached, on the best treatment, despite different therapeutic approaches. Intralesional (IL) immunotherapy has recently been shown to be effective in treating various wart forms.

Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of IL tuberculin, IL MMR vaccine, and intradermal (ID) BCG vaccination in treating viral warts.

Patients And Methods: Sixty patients with single or multiple warts were divided equally into three groups. Group A received IL MMR vaccine, and group B received IL tuberculin every 3 weeks (maximum 3 times). Group C received ID BCG vaccination in the arm with one month interval (maximum 3 times). Recurrence was followed up for 6 months.

Results: In group A, complete response occurred in 30%, partial response in 5%, and no response in 65%. In group B, complete response occurred in 45%, partial response in 20%, minimal response in 10% and no response in 25%. In group C, complete response occurred in 70%, partial response in 5%, minimal response in 5%, and no response in 20%. No recurrence was observed in group A and B but occurred in one patient in group C with the same lesion.

Conclusions: Immunotherapy by IL tuberculin and ID BCG vaccination are safe, effective, and inexpensive techniques in treating all types of warts even if recalcitrant or multiple but immunotherapy by IL MMR vaccine has shown less effectiveness and less safety technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13921DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mmr vaccine
16
bcg vaccination
12
group received
12
group complete
12
complete response
12
response occurred
12
partial response
12
response
11
tuberculin bcg
8
group
8

Similar Publications

Non-colorectal Cancer Screening and Vaccinations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

January 2025

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville FL. Electronic address:

Description: The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to provide best practice advice (BPA) statements for gastroenterologists and other health care providers who provide care to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The focus is on IBD-specific screenings (excluding colorectal cancer screening, which is discussed separately) and vaccinations. We provide guidance to ensure that patients are up to date with the disease-specific cancer screenings, vaccinations, as well as advice for mental health and general wellbeing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events following measles-containing vaccines in infants less than 12 months of age.

Vaccine

January 2025

The Child and Adolescent Clinic, Juliane Marie Center, The Danish National University Hospital "Rigshospitalet", Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Background: Lowering the age for receiving the first dose of a measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) has been suggested to close the emerging immunity gap in infants. However, tolerability remains one of the main concerns for vaccine-hesitant parents. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of reactogenicity following MCV1 in infants under 12 months of age.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vaccination against measles-mumps-rubella and rates of non-targeted infectious disease hospitalisations: Nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

J Infect

January 2025

Bandim Health Project, Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Objectives: To investigate if receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine following the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP3) is associated with reduced rates of non-targeted infectious disease hospitalisations.

Methods: Register based cohort study following 1,397,027 children born in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden until 2 years of age. Rates of infectious disease hospitalisations with minimum one overnight stay according to time-varying vaccination status were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with age as the underlying timescale and including multiple covariates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Post-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of measles: A systematic review.

Vaccine

January 2025

Centre for Immunization Surveillance and Programs, Infectious Disease and Vaccine Program Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd S, Nepean, ON K1A0K9, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University. Electronic address:

Background: In susceptible individuals, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is often recommended following exposure to measles, however the data that these recommendations are based on are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of immunoglobulins (Ig) or measles-containing vaccine (MCV) for the prevention of measles.

Methods: Prospective studies evaluating the use of Ig or MCV as PEP in susceptible individuals exposed to measles were eligible for inclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Progress of Measles and Rubella Surveillance in the Context of Measles Elimination in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2019-2022.

Vaccines (Basel)

November 2024

Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

In 2015, the 62nd session of the Regional Committee [RC] of the Eastern Mediterranean Region [EMR] endorsed the Eastern Mediterranean Vaccine Action Plan 2016-2020 (EMVAP) that included postponement of the measles elimination target to before 2020. However, the EMR does not have a regional rubella control or elimination goal. We reviewed the progress of measles and rubella surveillance in context of measles elimination in the Eastern Mediterranean Region during 2019-2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!