AI Article Synopsis

  • Conventional assisted reproductive technology (ART) can delay cancer treatment and increase psychological stress among patients, prompting a study to compare random start (RS-COH) and conventional start (CS-COH) protocols for fertility preservation in cancer patients.
  • The study involved 111 patients, focusing on outcomes like the number of oocytes and embryos produced, with findings showing that RS-COH provided a higher median number of MII (metaphase II) oocytes (7 vs. 5) but required longer stimulation time (12 vs. 10 days).
  • Ultimately, the results indicated that RS-COH is as effective in producing viable oocytes as CS-COH, thereby making it a viable option for cancer patients needing

Article Abstract

Conventional assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles may delay cancer treatment and compromise survival, and also increase patients' psychological burden as a result of delayed chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the success rates of random start and conventional start GnRH antagonist protocols in terms of oocyte and embryo outputs in cancer patients. Data of 111 patients with a newly diagnosed cancer who underwent ART for fertility preservation at a university-based infertility clinic between January 2010 and September 2019 were reviewed. The study group underwent random start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (RS-COH) and the control group underwent conventional start COH (CS-COH). The main outcome measures were the number of total oocytes, MII oocytes, and embryo yield. A total of 46 patients (41.5%) underwent RS-COH and 65 (58.5%) underwent CS-COH. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The most common cancer type in both groups was breast cancer (60.9% vs. 52.3%, respectively). The median duration of stimulation was significantly longer in RS-COH than in CS-COH (12 vs. 10 days; P = 0.005). The median number of MII oocytes was significantly higher in RS-COH than in CS-COH (7 vs. 5 oocytes, respectively; P = 0.020). The MII/AFC ratio was significantly higher in the RS-COH group compared to the CS-COH group (74% and 57% respectively; p = 0.02). In the linear regression analyses, RS-COH protocol did not have a significant impact on MII/AFC (standardized ß coefficient - 0.514; P = 0.289 {adjusted R for the model = 0.779}), oocyte yield (standardized ß coefficient - 0.070; P = 0.829 {adjusted R for the model = 0.840}), and MII rate (standardized ß coefficient - 0.504; P = 0.596 {adjusted R for the model = 0.271}). In conclusion, RS-COH protocol is as effective as CS-COH protocols for fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00412-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

random start
12
cancer patients
12
fertility preservation
12
standardized coefficient
12
oocyte embryo
8
start controlled
8
controlled ovarian
8
conventional start
8
group underwent
8
mii oocytes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!