AI Article Synopsis

  • This review evaluates the current use of Resuscitative Endovascular Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in both out-of-hospital (OOH) and in-hospital (H) settings for blunt and penetrating trauma, highlighting potential areas for future research to enhance its application.
  • A literature analysis revealed that REBOA outside of hospitals resulted in a significantly higher survival rate (88.6%) compared to in-hospital cases (50.4%), with different injury types influencing the zones used for occlusion.
  • The review suggests that improving REBOA outcomes may hinge on implementing quicker initiation post-injury rather than solely enhancing the REBOA technique itself, emphasizing the

Article Abstract

Background: In this review, we assess the state of Resuscitative Endovascular Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) today with respect to out-of-hospital (OOH) vs. inhospital (H) use in blunt and penetrating trauma, as well as discuss areas of promising research that may be key in further advancement of REBOA applications.

Methods: To analyze the trends in REBOA use, we conducted a review of the literature and identified articles with human or animal data that fit the respective inclusion and exclusion criteria. In separate tables, we compiled data extracted from selected articles in categories including injury type, zone and duration of REBOA, setting in which REBOA was performed, sample size, age, sex and outcome. Based on these tables as well as more detailed review of some key cases of REBOA usage, we assessed the current state of REBOA as well as coagulation and histological disturbances associated with its usage. All statistical tests were 2-sided using an alpha=0.05 for significance. Analysis was done using SAS 9.5 (Cary, NC). Tests for significance was done with a t-test for continuous data and a Chi Square Test for categorical data.

Results: In a total of 44 cases performed outside of a hospital in both military and civilian settings, the overall survival was found to be 88.6%, significantly higher than the 50.4% survival calculated from 1,807 cases of REBOA performed within a hospital (p<.0001). We observe from human data a propensity to use Zone I in penetrating trauma and Zone III in blunt injuries. We observe lower final metabolic markers in animal studies with shorter REBOA time and longer follow-up times.

Conclusions: Further research related to human use of REBOA must be focused on earlier initiation of REBOA after injury which may depend on development of rapid vascular access devices and techniques more so than on any new improvements in REBOA. Future animal studies should provide detailed multisystem organ assessment to accurately define organ injury and metabolic burden associated with REBOA application. Overall, animal studies must involve realistic models of injury with severe clinical scenarios approximating human trauma and exsanguination, especially with long-term follow-up after injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789715PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00807-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reboa
9
resuscitative endovascular
8
occlusion aorta
8
aorta reboa
8
reboa performed
8
cases reboa
8
performed hospital
8
endovascular balloon
4
balloon occlusion
4
reboa update
4

Similar Publications

Pelvic packing - status 2024.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

January 2025

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Patients with unstable hemodynamics and unstable pelvic ring injuries are still demanding patients regarding initial treatment and survival. Several concepts were reported during the last 30 years. Mechanical stabilization of the pelvis together with hemorrhage control offer the best treatment option in these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although controversial, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used to manage liver injuries. This matched cohort study evaluated outcomes in severe liver injuries treated with REBOA or without REBOA.

Methods: Trauma Quality Improvement Program database study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Noncompressible truncal hemorrhage is a major contributor to preventable deaths in trauma patients and, despite advances in emergency care, still poses a big challenge.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of trauma resuscitation care incorporating Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) compared to standard care for managing uncontrolled torso or lower body hemorrhage.

Methods: This study utilized a target trial design with a matched case-control methodology, emulating randomized 1 : 1 allocation for patients receiving trauma resuscitation care with or without the use of REBOA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hemorrhagic shock is a significant cause of trauma-related mortality. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less-invasive aortic occlusion maneuver for severe hemorrhagic shock but potentially inducing oxidative stress injuries. In an animal model, this study investigated hydrogen gas inhalation therapy's potential to mitigate post-REBOA ischemia-reperfusion injuries (IRIs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring fractures from high-energy trauma are critical injuries in trauma care, requiring urgent intervention and precise diagnostics. With ongoing advancements in trauma management, treatment strategies have evolved, with some techniques becoming obsolete as new ones emerge. This study aimed to evaluate changes and trends in treatment algorithms for these injuries over approximately 40 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!