Validation of the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision Codes for Kidney Transplant Rejection and Failure.

Can J Kidney Health Dis

Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Published: December 2020

Background: Clinical research requires that diagnostic codes captured from routinely collected health administrative data accurately identify individuals with a disease.

Objective: In this study, we validated the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) definition for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) and for kidney transplant failure (T86.101).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A large, regional transplantation center in Ontario, Canada.

Patients: All adult kidney transplant recipients from 2002 to 2018.

Measurements: Chart review was undertaken to identify the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed rejection and graft loss for all participants. For each observation, we determined the first date a single ICD-10 code T86.100 or T86.101 was recorded as a hospital encounter discharge diagnosis.

Methods: Using chart review as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for the ICD-10 codes T86.100 and T86.101.

Results: Our study population comprised of 1,258 kidney transplant recipients. The prevalence of rejection and death-censored graft loss were 15.6 and 9.1%, respectively. For the ICD-10 rejection code (T86.100), sensitivity was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.6-79.2), specificity 97.5% (96.5-98.4), and PPV 83.8% (78.3-89.4). For the ICD-10 graft loss code (T86.101), sensitivity was 21.2% (95% CI, 13.2-29.3), specificity 86.3% (84.3-88.3), and PPV 11.7% (7.0-16.4).

Limitations: Single-center study which may limit generalizability of our findings.

Conclusions: A single ICD-10 code for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) was present in 84% of true kidney transplant rejections and is an accurate way of identifying kidney transplant recipients with rejection using administrative health data. The ICD-10 code for graft failure (T86.101) performed poorly and should not be used for administrative health research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747098PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358120977390DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kidney transplant
32
transplant rejection
12
transplant recipients
12
graft loss
12
icd-10 code
12
international classification
8
classification disease
8
disease 10th
8
10th revision
8
kidney
8

Similar Publications

Highly sensitized (HS) patients in need of kidney transplantation (KTx) typically spend a longer time waiting for compatible kidneys, are unlikely to receive an organ offer, and are at increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Desensitization using imlifidase, which is more rapid and removes total body immunoglobulin G (IgG) to a greater extent than other methods, enables transplantation to occur between HLA-incompatible (HLAi) donor-recipient pairs and allows patients to have greater access to KTx. However, when the project was launched there was limited data and clinical experience with desensitization in general and with imlifidase specifically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This retrospective study analyzes the histopathological patterns of skin lesions in 430 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria from 2018-2023. Patient demographics reveal a mean age of 43.56 years, with a near-equal gender distribution (50.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although granulomatous interstitial nephritis (GIN) is a rare histological finding in kidney transplants, the joint occurrence of GIN and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has not, to our knowledge, been reported in the literature. We report a case of GIN and de novo FSGS in kidney transplant recipients leading to allograft failure. A 69-year-old male with a history of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) of unknown etiology, as well as liver failure from hepatitis B and C co-infection, initially had a living unrelated kidney transplant (LURT) in 2007 and subsequently received both liver and kidney transplants (SLKTs) in 2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Aortoiliac screening before kidney transplantation is suggested by some guidelines to select patients for transplantation and to assist surgical planning. We investigated the clinical outcomes of systematic screening for aortoiliac disease in potential kidney transplant candidates.

Methods: In this observational study, 470 potential kidney transplant candidates underwent aortoiliac computed tomography angiography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!