Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for advanced esophageal cancer, but it may be more invasive in the elderly and definitive radiotherapy (RT) alone may be selected. This study assessed the significance of sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) in elderly esophageal cancer patients.
Methods: We reviewed 87 patients aged 75 years and older, who were treated using definitive radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. A total dose ranging from 50.4 to 63 Gy (median, 58.8) was delivered to the primary lesion and the involved lymph nodes. This study compared patients who received SCRT with those who received RT alone among 40 patients with stage III or IVA cancer. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and the generalized Wilcoxon test.
Results: The total progression-free survival (TPFS), progression-free survival outside the irradiation field, and overall survival were significantly longer after SCRT (n = 15) than after definitive RT alone (n = 25; P = 0.0041 and 0.0098), whereas the progression-free survival in the irradiation field was not significantly different between the two groups. The TPFS was significantly shorter in patients who received RT alone than in those who received SCRT (P = 0.0372). There were no grade 4 or higher adverse events in the patients who received SCRT.
Conclusion: SCRT was associated with a reduced relapse rate, suggesting that it should be considered for markedly elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_768_19 | DOI Listing |
Background: Esophageal and gastric cancer were among the top 10 most common cancers worldwide. In addition, sex-specific differences were observed in the incidence. Due to their anatomic proximity, the 2 cancers have both different but also shared risk factors and epidemiological features.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Imaging
January 2025
Department of Pathology, Dr. Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose: To evaluate the staging performance of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for confirmed esophageal cancer based on the TNM classification system as well as compare it to other alternative modalities (e.g., endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), MRI, and PET/CT) in a full head-to-head manner.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
January 2025
Departments of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background: This study proposes a modified lymph node (LN) staging category (BALN) on the basis of the number of positive LNs before (prepN) and after (ypN) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) to improve prognostic stratification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Patients And Methods: A total of 381 patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT at three medical centers were retrospectively enrolled. The ypN categories were scored according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) staging manual.
Surgery
January 2025
Department of Gastrointestinal and Esophageal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Electronic address:
Objective: The construction of a gastric-tube-substitute esophagus is a common method for digestive tract reconstruction after esophagectomy. However, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage remains high. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 gastric tube fabrication methods-cis-cutting and retro-cutting-in reducing postoperative anastomotic leakage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Background: The optimal oesophagogastric anastomosis technique for oesophageal cancer surgery remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to compare oesophagogastric anastomosis techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery.
Methods: A systematic review and NMA were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines-NMA extension.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!