A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Characteristic Clinicopathological Features of Secondary Extramammary Paget Disease With Underlying Anorectal Adenocarcinoma: Evenly Circumferential Perianal Distribution, Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus-like Changes, and Subepidermal Mucin Deposits Without Invasive Tumor Cells. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigated the differences between secondary extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) associated with anorectal adenocarcinoma and primary EMPD, focusing on clinical and histopathological features.
  • Out of 25 cases reviewed, secondary EMPD showed distinct characteristics such as evenly distributed perianal lesions, while primary EMPD had uneven and asymmetrical lesions.
  • Key histopathological features like fibroepithelioma of Pinkus-like changes and subepidermal mucin deposits were observed in secondary EMPD cases, but not in primary ones, aiding in differentiation between the two types.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to identify the clinical and histopathological characteristics of secondary extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) with underlying anorectal adenocarcinoma so as to differentiate it from primary cutaneous EMPD. Seventeen and 8 cases of primary and secondary EMPD with anorectal adenocarcinoma, respectively, were retrieved from the pathology archive and the clinical and histopathological features reviewed. The tumor samples from 21 cases were totally resected specimens, whereas 3 and 1 of secondary and primary cases were punch biopsied, respectively. All 8 (100%) cases of secondary EMPD presented evenly distributed perianal lesions. By contrast, 4 of 17 (23.5%) primary EMPD cases had perianal skin lesions and displayed an uneven, asymmetrical distribution around the anus. Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus-like changes and subepidermal mucin deposits with no or few invasive tumor cells were observed in 6 (75%) and 3 (37.5%) of the 8 secondary EMPD cases, respectively, although 3 secondary case samples were small biopsy specimens. Both the histopathological changes were not observed in any of the 17 primary EMPD cases. Evenly circumferential perianal distribution, fibroepithelioma of Pinkus-like changes, and subepidermal mucin deposits without invasive tumor cells were characteristic to cases of secondary EMPD with anorectal adenocarcinoma. These clinicopathological features could be used to differentiate between secondary and primary EMPD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000001877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anorectal adenocarcinoma
16
secondary empd
16
fibroepithelioma pinkus-like
12
pinkus-like changes
12
changes subepidermal
12
subepidermal mucin
12
mucin deposits
12
deposits invasive
12
invasive tumor
12
tumor cells
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!