Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of Coflex interspinous device versus laminectomy.

Summary Of Background Data: Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization device (CID) is indicated for one- or two-level lumbar stenosis with grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis in adult patients, as an alternative to laminectomy, or laminectomy and fusion. CID provides stability against progressive spondylolisthesis, retains motion, and prevents further disc space collapse.

Methods: Patients ≥18 years' old with lumbar stenosis and grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis who underwent either primary single-level decompression and implantation of CID, or single-level laminectomy alone were included with a minimum 90-day follow-up at a single academic institution. Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were reviewed until the latest follow-up. χ2 and independent samples t tests were used for analysis.

Results: Eighty-three patients (2007-2019) were included: 37 cases of single-level laminectomy (48.6% female) were compared to 46 single-level CID (50% female). CID cohort was older (CID 69.0 ± 9.4 vs. laminectomy 64.2 ± 11.0, P = 0.042) and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (CID 2.59 ± 0.73 vs. laminectomy 2.17 ± 0.48, P = 0.020). CID patients had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (97.50 ± 77.76 vs. 52.84 ± 50.63 mL, P = 0.004), longer operative time (141.91 ± 47.88 vs. 106.81 ± 41.30 minutes, P = 0.001), and longer length of stay (2.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.001). Total perioperative complications (21.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.035) and instrumentation-related complication was higher in CID (10.9% vs. 0% laminectomy group, P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences between the groups in demographics or outcomes.

Conclusion: Single-level CID devices had higher perioperative 90-day complications, longer operative time, length of stay, higher EBL compared to laminectomies alone. Similar overall revision and neurologic complication rates were noted compared to laminectomy at last follow-up.Level of Evidence: 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single-level laminectomy
12
cid
10
laminectomy
9
coflex interspinous
8
lumbar stenosis
8
stenosis grade
8
grade stable
8
stable spondylolisthesis
8
single-level cid
8
longer operative
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study sought to characterize the incidence of, timing of, predictive factors for, and reasons for emergency department (ED) visits within 90 days of single-level posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). These visits, after PCF, have received limited attention.

Materials And Methods: The 2010-2022 M161 PearlDiver database was queried for elective single-level PCFs, excluding multilevel procedures, midline laminectomies, fusions, or other posterior/anterior procedures, as well as indications of trauma, infection, or neoplasm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVF) are common vascular malformations in the spine, necessitating surgical intervention to prevent neurological issues, but there’s limited research comparing surgical methods.
  • A systematic review analyzed various surgical techniques used to treat sDAVF and found variability in approaches, with single-level laminectomy being the most common.
  • The study identified 16 significant open questions regarding surgical methods and the need for further research to improve treatment standards and techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Facet joint destruction causes postoperative spinal instability, resulting in poor clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery. However, the effect of facet joint destruction on radiographic and clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) is unknown. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the effect of facet joint resection on radiographic and clinical outcomes after single-level MEL surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

L3-L4/L4-L5 Type II-A spondylolisthesis: A case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

November 2024

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.

Article Synopsis
  • Double level isthmic spondylolisthesis at the L3-L4/L4-L5 levels is a rare condition, with limited documented cases and no detailed reports so far.
  • A 49-year-old male patient with this condition, along with neurological symptoms, underwent a complex surgical procedure after conservative treatments failed, including laminectomy and interbody fusion.
  • The successful clinical outcome of this case highlights the importance of surgical intervention, providing valuable insights for future treatments of similar cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study analyzed the surgical treatment and management of patients with traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fractures from 2019 to 2021, dividing them into two groups based on continuous (Group 1) and noncontinuous (Group 2) fractures.
  • - Researchers evaluated various factors, including age, gender, fracture type, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, while excluding patients above 65 and those with single-level or pathological fractures.
  • - Results indicated that while certain demographic and clinical factors were similar, significant differences were found in operation duration, blood loss, hospitalization length, number of fusions, and instrumentation between the two fracture types.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!