Antiarrhythmic drug therapy can affect pacemaker parameters in both the atrial and ventricular myocardium. It is not known whether antiarrhythmic drugs impact His bundle pacing/sensing parameters and His to ventricle (H-V) intervals following permanent His bundle pacing (HBP). The aims of the study were to prospectively determine the influence of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on pacing parameters and H-V conduction after His bundle lead implantation and to assess the impact of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on the safety of HBP. Patients ( = 140) with QRS duration < 120 ms who met permanent pacing indications were prospectively enrolled. Propafenone, lidocaine, and adenosine were injected intravenously after implantation of 3,830 lead during the procedure. Metoprolol succinate, amiodarone, and digoxin were taken orally for 1 month. Pacing parameters before and after drug intervention was measured, including His capture threshold, sensing and impedance, H-V interval, and conduction. There were no statistically significant differences in His bundle pacing thresholds, impedance, and sensing after drug intervention at implantation or during a 2-month follow-up ( > 0.05). The HV interval was not affected except in the large-dose propafenone group where HV interval prolonged ( = 0.001). All patients maintained 1:1 H-V conduction following drug administration. There was no adverse impact on the HBP parameters or H-V conduction after the administration of commonly used dosage of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs. The drugs were safe in patients with permanent His bundle pacing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773716 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.585165 | DOI Listing |
Heart
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Background: Preventing high heart rates in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a key objective of AF management. Data regarding heart rates in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) is lacking. This analysis aimed to provide insight into heart rates during PAF episodes measured with continuous implantable loop monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Pract Cases Emerg Med
May 2023
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Internal Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Introduction: Late atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation occur in up to 30% of post-ablation patients and are increasingly encountered by emergency physicians. However, diagnosing the exact mechanism of the arrhythmia on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) remains challenging due to atrial scarring leading to heterogeneous P-wave morphology.
Case Report: A 74-year-old male with a history of prior catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation presented with palpitations and subacute symptoms of heart failure.
Int J Heart Fail
July 2021
Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiac Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, India.
Background And Objectives: Persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) with heart failure (HF) arguably constitutes the sickest subset of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
Methods: A systematic search was made in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of PeAF patients with systolic HF comparing all-cause mortality, change in HF-related quality of life (QoL) and hospitalization due to heart failure (HHF) were performed among catheter ablation (CA) of AF, rate-controlling drugs (RCDs), anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs), and atrio-ventricular nodal ablation (AVNA) using Bayesian random effect model.
Front Cardiovasc Med
December 2020
Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy can affect pacemaker parameters in both the atrial and ventricular myocardium. It is not known whether antiarrhythmic drugs impact His bundle pacing/sensing parameters and His to ventricle (H-V) intervals following permanent His bundle pacing (HBP). The aims of the study were to prospectively determine the influence of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on pacing parameters and H-V conduction after His bundle lead implantation and to assess the impact of rhythm and rate-controlling drugs on the safety of HBP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrehosp Disaster Med
June 2019
1.Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center,Orlando, FloridaUSA.
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) is a common tachydysrhythmia encountered by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Current guidelines suggest rate control in stable, symptomatic patients.
Problem: Little is known about the safety or efficacy of rate-controlling medications given by prehospital providers.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!