A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of qPCR, Sanger Sequencing, and Whole-Genome Sequencing in Determining Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin Resistance in . | LitMetric

antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for more rapid resistance detection prior to the administration of eradication regimens. Macrolides and fluoroquinolones are widely used to treat . In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of A) 23SrDNA qPCR (with melting curve analysis) and an in-house developed qPCR followed by Sanger sequencing with a commercial IVD-marked hybridization probe assay (for 23SrDNA and ) using 142 gastric biopsies (skipping culturing) and B) the same two qPCR for 23SrDNA and (including Sanger sequencing) with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phenotypic characterization of clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance using 76 cultured isolates. The sensitivity of both qPCRs was 100% compared to that of the commercial IVD-marked hybridization probe assay for the detection of in gastric biopsies (without resistance testing). The specificity of the qPCR followed by Sanger sequencing was 100%, indicating that the best sequence identity was always . The results show good agreement between molecular tests, especially between qPCR (inclusive Sanger sequencing) and WGS. Discrepancies (concerning mutated or wild type of positive gastric biopsies) were observed between Sanger sequencing of the gene and the corresponding commercial hybridization probe assay, mostly because the high sequence diversity of the gene even at positions adjacent to the relevant codons of 87 and 91 interfered with obtaining correct results from the hybridization probe assay. Interestingly, we found several mixed sequences, indicating mixed populations in the gastric biopsies (direct detection without culturing). There was a high percentage of both levofloxacin and clarithromycin resistance in gastric biopsies (both between 22% and 29%, direct detection in gastric biopsies). Therefore, we recommend analyzing both targets in parallel. We confirmed that phenotypic resistance is highly correlated with the associated mutations. We concluded that the two qPCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the gene is a fast, cost-effective and comprehensive method for resistance testing of directly in gastric biopsies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773895PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.596371DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sanger sequencing
28
gastric biopsies
28
qpcr sanger
16
hybridization probe
16
probe assay
16
sequencing
9
diagnostic performance
8
sequencing whole-genome
8
whole-genome sequencing
8
clarithromycin levofloxacin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!