Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach.

R Soc Open Sci

Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Published: November 2020

Differences in COVID-19 testing and tracing across countries, as well as changes in testing within each country over time, make it difficult to estimate the true (population) infection rate based on the confirmed number of cases obtained through RNA viral testing. We applied a backcasting approach to estimate a distribution for the true (population) cumulative number of infections (infected and recovered) for 15 developed countries. Our sample comprised countries with similar levels of medical care and with populations that have similar age distributions. Monte Carlo methods were used to robustly sample parameter uncertainty. We found a strong and statistically significant negative relationship between the proportion of the population who test positive and the implied true detection rate. Despite an overall improvement in detection rates as the pandemic has progressed, our estimates showed that, as at 31 August 2020, the true number of people to have been infected across our sample of 15 countries was 6.2 (95% CI: 4.3-10.9) times greater than the reported number of cases. In individual countries, the true number of cases exceeded the reported figure by factors that range from 2.6 (95% CI: 1.8-4.5) for South Korea to 17.5 (95% CI: 12.2-30.7) for Italy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735365PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200909DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

true population
12
number cases
12
population infection
8
infection rate
8
backcasting approach
8
true number
8
true
6
countries
5
number
5
robust estimates
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!