Midwives and obstetricians' attitudes towards VBAC: Development and validation of the HCAV-scale.

Sex Reprod Healthc

Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: February 2021

Objective: To develop a scale that measures attitudes towards vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) among clinicians.

Methods: A cross sectional survey among midwives (n = 58) and obstetricians (n = 51). A 23-item "Hannover Clinicians' Attitudes towards VBAC scale" (HCAV-scale) was developed. Indicators of reliability and validity were assessed, including item-to-total correlation, Cronbach alpha coefficient and factor analysis.

Results: The response rate was 35.3% (n = 109). The HCAV-scale showed high construct validity and high internal consistency. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the 23 items was 0.87 (n = 89), indicating good internal consistency of the items. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in factor loadings between 0.34 and 0.70; all 23 items loaded above 0.3 on one factor, providing evidence that the scale can be conceptualized as one-dimensional.

Conclusions: The HCAV-scale is a reliable and valid tool to assess clinicians' favourable attitudes towards VBAC. The scale can be used to assess how attitudes of clinicians might contribute to institutional variations in VBAC rates, and has the potential to enhance inter-professional understanding and collaboration around VBAC and quality of care for childbearing people with a previous caesarean.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100589DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

attitudes vbac
12
cronbach alpha
8
alpha coefficient
8
internal consistency
8
vbac
6
attitudes
5
midwives obstetricians'
4
obstetricians' attitudes
4
vbac development
4
development validation
4

Similar Publications

Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

November 2024

Department of Obstetric and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Background: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Birth (VBAC) is a birth mode recommended for reducing repeat cesarean which potentially contributes to adverse outcomes. However, VBAC is not normally practiced in some countries. Providers are an important part of the decision-making process on modes of birth among pregnant individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Obstetric Violence in Italy: From Theoretical Premises to Court Judgments.

Clin Ter

February 2024

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Introduction: Historical mistreatment and violence directed toward women's bodies extend to the field of medicine, and obstetric and gynecological practices are not immune to such misconduct. Obstetric violence (OV) refers to actions involving disrespectful, abusive, or coercive treatment directed at pregnant and birthing women. This includes institutional and personal attitudes that lead to the violation of women's autonomy, human rights, and sexual and reproductive health.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disparities in maternal health outcomes are striking. Historical and biased clinical support tools have potential to exacerbate inequities. In 2022, NewYork-Presbyterian, with ∼25,000 annual births, and our academic partners, Columbia and Weill Cornell, launched a program to better understand practice patterns and clinician attitudes toward a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator, which predicts VBAC success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient-Led Approaches to a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Calculator.

Obstet Gynecol

October 2023

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, the Institute for Global Health Sciences, the Department of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing, and the Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; the Birth Place Lab and the School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and the Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Objective: To describe patient approaches to navigating their probability of a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) within the context of prediction scores generated from the original Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units' VBAC calculator, which incorporated race and ethnicity as one of six risk factors.

Methods: We invited a diverse group of participants with a history of prior cesarean delivery to participate in interviews and have their prenatal visits recorded. Using an open-ended iterative interview guide, we queried and observed these individuals' mode-of-birth decisions in the context of their VBAC calculator scores.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Labor after cesarean (LAC) remains an optional delivery method among healthy pregnant individuals. Exploring women's attitudes, preferences, reasons for previous cesarean delivery, and the incentives underlying pregnant individuals' preferences could help us understand their choice of delivery mode. In this study we evaluated the preferences and attitudes of eligible pregnant women regarding participation in a LAC in Foshan, China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!