The purpose of this rapid review was to identify and synthesize evidence on the impact of postal correspondence letters on participation in cancer screening and to determine whether impact varied by cancer site or inclusion of the participant's physician's name within the letter (i.e., physician-linked). PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for English-language systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up until October 2019. One reviewer completed citation screening and data extraction with 30% verification by a second reviewer. Systematic reviews and RCTs were appraised using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tools, respectively, by one reviewer with complete verification by a second reviewer. Findings from systematic reviews and RCTs were examined separately and presented narratively. Six systematic reviews and 18 RCTs of generally low quality were included. Evidence generally demonstrated a positive impact of a letter as compared to no letter or usual practice on screening participation. This finding was consistent for breast cancer and cervical screening participation but inconsistent for colorectal cancer screening participation. Studies comparing physician-linked letters to no letters or usual practice reported similar effect estimates as those examining letters in general. Limited and inconsistent evidence was identified on the impact of physician-linked letters as compared to non-physician-linked letters on screening participation. Evidence identified in this rapid review, and other contextual and implementation considerations, may be useful for jurisdictions considering how to promote cancer screening participation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106404 | DOI Listing |
Eat Weight Disord
January 2025
Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Integr Cancer Ther
January 2025
Guang 'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Braz J Psychiatry
January 2025
Departamento de Psiquiatria, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil. Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Neurociências Integrativas (LiNC), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Programa de Esquizofrenia (PROESQ), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Objective: This article aims to systematically review the studies on schizophrenia in Brazil, addressing geographical coverage as an indicator of sampling representativeness, essential to infer results' generalization. It also highlights the variation in research funding across different regions.
Methods: We searched for studies carried out until July 2023.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Gelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.
Background: Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been used more frequently in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in recent years. However, there are still concerns that these procedures may lead to complications such as overconstraint of the lateral compartment, stiffness, infections, tunnel convergence, and other intra- and postoperative complications because of increased surgical time and the need for additional procedures.
Hypothesis/purpose: The lateral extra-articular procedure will reduce the failure rate of reconstructed ACLs without increasing the number of complications.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!