Use of recombinant activated factor VII for the treatment of perioperative bleeding in noncardiac surgery patients without hemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Crit Care

Department of Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1(st) Dahua Rd, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, PR China.

Published: April 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for noncardiac patients undergoing surgery.
  • Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 993 patients were included, revealing that rFVIIa did not significantly affect overall mortality, length of ICU or hospital stays, or the incidence of thromboembolic events.
  • However, it was noted that rFVIIa could reduce blood loss and the need for transfusion in certain patients, indicating its potential benefits in specific cases despite no overall mortality impact.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in noncardiac patients.

Materials And Methods: We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved the use of rFVIIa through December 13, 2019 in noncardiac patients without hemophilia. Two investigators extracted the related data and assessed the quality of the included trials.

Results: Eleven RCTs examining 993 perioperative patients were ultimately included. The use of rFVIIa did not decrease all-cause mortality (RR:0.90; 95% CI:0.50,1.64; I = 0.0%; P = 0.738), shorten the length of ICU (SMD:-0.15; 95% CI:-0.47,0.17; I = 0.0%; P = 0.346) or hospital (SMD:0.42; 95% CI:-0.05,0.89; I = 0.0%; P = 0.078) stay, or increase incidence of the thromboembolic events (RR:1.30; 95% CI:0.70,2.41; I = 0.0%; P = 0.403) among perioperative patients. However, individual RCT analyses showed that the use of rFVIIa could reduce the volume of blood loss (including prostatic cancer, severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), and spinal disease) and the transfusion of RBCs (including prostatic cancer, SAP, and spinal disease) and FFP (SAP) in a subset of perioperative patients. Publication bias was not present.

Conclusions: For perioperative hemorrhagic patients, rFVIIa-based hemostatic therapy showed no effect on mortality, ICU or hospital LOS, or the rate of thromboembolic events, although it appears to decrease blood loss and reduce the need for blood product transfusion in a subset of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perioperative patients
12
recombinant activated
8
activated factor
8
factor vii
8
patients hemophilia
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
thromboembolic events
8
blood loss
8
including prostatic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!